FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Cover Story

Suicide by Cop

Self-destructive subjects seeking an easy exit can get cops and innocent bystanders killed.

April 30, 2010  |  by - Also by this author

Changing Tactics

For many agencies, the playbook for how to handle potential suicides has begun to change. In the aftermath of Barbara Schneider's death, the Minneapolis PD began to deploy a Crisis Intervention Team along the lines of that formulated by the Memphis Police Department.

"One of the biggest things was we went to Memphis and picked up a CIT program and implemented it," says Palmer. "We keep 150 officers trained in the crisis intervention team model. Every officer on the department has had at least an awareness level module on mental health response."

Palmer himself now trains officers to deal with the mentally ill in the hopes that another Barbara Schneider tragedy can be averted. Minneapolis PD CIT officers are called upon to de-escalate a variety of situations, not only mental health emergency response. The department has also invested heavily in less-lethal weapon options, including TASERs.

Palmer notes that one of the biggest keys to the success of the department's CIT lies in how it selects its members. "We pick officers who we think will do well in the program and who will spend time to work with people to calm them down and get them the help they need."

At the same time, Palmer says the department remains realistic about the prospect for deadly force in dealing with the mentally ill, and has increased sensitivity for officers who may find themselves having to deploy it.

Cop Killers

Schneider's death was tragic, but no more so than the deaths of officers who have been killed while trying to mitigate suicide by cop situations. Indeed, it may even be problematic for cops to realize they are facing a suicide by cop situation, until it's too late.

When Lt. Billy Ray Jiles of the Carroll County (Ga.) Sheriff's Department set up outside a house wherein a domestic violence suspect had killed the owner before barricading himself, the last thing he might have expected was for the man to exit the house with two guns blazing. But that's exactly what happened and Jiles was killed. A suicide note recovered from the suspect's body after an ensuing gunbattle left little doubt that the man's intent had been suicide by cop.

Suicidal Cops

No suicide by cop incident is more difficult for officers to face than a fellow officer or former officer who chooses to use his or her colleagues to make an exit.

Capt. Dan Barnett of the Columbia County (Ga.) Sheriff's Office found himself on a phone negotiating with a distraught former deputy who'd been fired a short time before. Just before putting the phone down and stepping outside, the former officer told Barnett, "I don't have the balls to do it myself; I'm going to make you do it."

Looking back on the incident, Barnett offers food for thought to other officers faced with a similar situation.

"Really, we let him get too close," Barnett says. "We gave him too much leeway because we knew him. One of our counter-snipers should have got him the moment he stepped off the porch. He wasn't but about 20 feet away when they finally shot him."

Barnett recalls another situation wherein a woman who'd previously fired rounds over deputies' heads announced that she was about to step outside.

"She said, 'I know that when I come outside and point my gun at those deputies they're going to have to shoot me.' She was correct."

Officer Mindset and Obligations

Assigning officers to specialized units tasked to deal with emotionally compromised individuals is a huge step in addressing suicide by cop situations. But often it is the first responder's initial approach to the situation that will dictate its conclusion.

Many officers go above and beyond what is reasonably expected of them to intervene on another's behalf. Some have paid the ultimate price. Often, this obligation is self-imposed. If anything, courts have encouraged an almost laissez faire attitude on the matter of protecting others.

In Adams v. Fremont, the appeals court asserted that officers are not always obligated to intervene on behalf of some suicidal other. An appeals court ruled in Adams that officers "owed no legal duty of care" to a suicidal subject and they were immune from liability under Government Code section 820.2. "We hold that police officers responding to a crisis involving a person threatening suicide with a loaded firearm have no legal duty under tort law that would expose them to liability if their conduct fails to prevent the threatened suicide from being carried out," the judges wrote.

For officers, dealing with a suicide by cop attempt means containing the problem to the best of their abilities, having a realistic sense of their mission, adopting the requisite mindset, and relying on the best tactics and personnel available. For the departments, it means affording officers the training and resources with which to execute those responsibilities and the courage to support their officers' actions thereafter.

CONTINUED: Suicide by Cop «   Page 2 of 3   »

Tags: Officer Involved Shootings, Suicide by Cop, Friendly Fire, Officer Psychology


Comments (4)

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

Dottie Hadley @ 12/15/2011 7:35 PM

My son was shop and killed by a SWAT team that planned to kill him

in spite of the fact that they had pick-up papers to put him back in

the hospital. He did have a weapon but was only drunk. The CIT

officer said he was told that if he was suicidal, he was homicidal and

he was not a dangerous person. What can I do from prevent this

from happening to some other unsuspecting person? Why don't they improve the CIT training? My son did not want to die, and the

police had plenty of ways to shoot him. The guns were traded and

he was shot to kill. I do feel very bad when a policeman was killed

here by mentally ill man who killed several people. However, the

police choose their profession, knowing that they are risking their

lives. My son was never given a chance. I'd like to improve CIT

training, but have been unable to access police departments in this

state.

Kevin Nigh @ 1/18/2012 11:02 AM

What are you thinking? "He did have a weapon, but was only drunk." Evidently drunken people can't hurt someone with a weapon where you live, but when you come to the real world, drunk people kill innocent bystanders with weapons every day. "The police had several ways to shoot him." Again, what are you thinking? If he had lived, you would have been the one suing the police for millions for injuring your son. You don't shoot weapons out of people's hands, you shoot center mass, period. For the love of god, step up and take some responsibility yourself. Stop blaming everyone else.

CIT MOM @ 3/1/2012 10:32 AM

To Kevin,

Please understand that the previous commenter has recently lost her son. She is speaking from a place of enormous grief. Grieving people often look for answers and blame themselves as well as others. Civilians are not informed about the dangers of police work in a "real-world" sense. They get their information from television and movies. Put yourself in her shoes and you had just lost your child in this way. She needs to be educated in a respectful way.

Asking this woman to take responsibility for her son's shooting only pours salt in her wound. Its cruel. All mental illnesses do not come from bad parenting. I challenge you to listen to this mother and then ask her to listen to you. A healthy dialogue can go a long way toward facilitating understanding. I respect what police do for us day in and day out. Thank you for what you do to keep us safe.

Derrick Young @ 2/22/2014 8:57 AM

I understand what it means to lose a loved one at the hands of another but the mother must understand that her son, created a situation that really left few choices for most law enforcement officers. When faced with deadly force from an armed combatant, they too have a right to return home to their families also. Welding a handgun and being drunk at the same time is in most cases a death sentence. This is not like a TV show, if you've ever stood down a gun barrel or the potential of it--I'm sure you will quickly understand what they are dealing with. The biggest problem is not that the suspect is armed but the failure to drop the weapon and follow the commands of officers. They really don't want to kill anyone, but they too deserve to see their families again and yes--it's a deadly job. But that doesn't mean they should take extraordinary risk to preserve the life of someone who's a threat to the well-being of others. I'm truly sorry for your loss but I understand the officers too.

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.
Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine