FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Cover Story

Suicide by Cop

Self-destructive subjects seeking an easy exit can get cops and innocent bystanders killed.

April 30, 2010  |  by - Also by this author


It's 23:05 on a Sunday night in smalltown America. One of the local citizens has been suffering from a bout of the blues. And drinking. He's now in the middle of the street waving around a revolver and threatening to shoot anyone who comes near. He spouts expletives and urges the responding officers of the law: "Come on, you cowards. Shoot me!"

Such is the inexplicable behavior associated with people who attempt to get themselves shot at the hands of a law enforcement officer. It is a phenomenon common enough that it has become a part of the collective police consciousness and the American vernacular: It's known as "suicide by cop."

Rebecca Stincelli, author of "Suicide by Cop: Victims on Both Sides of the Badge," ultimately considers the phrase something of a misnomer.

"Suicide by cop is ultimately just that: suicide," Stincelli says. "We don't call other forms of suicide 'suicide by exhaust' or 'suicide by barbiturates.' We call them suicides."

Yet the term persists, much to the disgust of officers who are labeled "killers" by the press and the public. Stincelli finds the appraisal an unfair one. "When a person jumps to his death, we don't persecute the sidewalk," she explains. "But time and again, society will blame the cop."

Taking Others With Them

The first thing you learn when you delve into this topic is that most agencies do not classify officer-involved shootings. Suicide by cop statistics are compiled by forensic psychologists who study and evaluate officer-involved incidents.

Dr. Kris Mohandie published a study of officer-involved shootings that occurred between 1998 and 2006 in the Journal of Forensic Science. Mohandie determined that of 707 OIS incidents, 36 percent resulted from suicide by cop situations.

Mohandie found that suicide by cop is a very effective means of ending it all. In about 97 percent of the cases studied, the subject was killed. But Mohandie's research also reveals something that every good cop knows in his heart: These incidents are dangerous for the responding officer and the public. Mohandie's research says there is a one-in-three chance that some party other than the perpetrator will be injured or killed in any suicide by cop incident.

Bringing Them Back Alive

When you consider that 80 percent of the time the suicidal person is armed with a weapon—and 60 percent of the time the weapon of choice is a firearm—it is a wonder that officers are able to resolve any of these situations without the use of deadly force, let alone establish the appropriate psychiatric intervention.

A confluence of factors has successfully mitigated many of these incidents: Officers are trained to recognize such situations, they have developed better tactical communications skills, and they possess a wider variety of less-lethal weaponry.

But as the saying goes, you don't bring a knife—or a TASER—to a gunfight. And when confronted with either a knife or a firearm at close range, no matter how empathetic or patient the officer is, his hand may be forced and he will have to act to protect himself or others.

Unfortunately, the officer who acts will soon have to defend him or herself in a court of law or in the court of public opinion. He or she will also face personal doubts over the incident. And of course, the officer's personal questions will soon be joined by many questions from the public and from the agency he or she works for. Everything from racial demographics, to the number of rounds fired, to the commands made will be Monday morning quarterbacked.

When Alonzo Heyward stalked about his Chattanooga, Tenn., neighborhood ranting about suicide while carrying a rifle, it set off a series of confrontations with local law enforcement. It culminated with six officers firing a cumulative 59 rounds at Heyward, who suffered 43 bullet wounds to his chest, face, arms, hands, legs, buttocks, and groin.

Local activists raised questions about the number of shots and levied accusation at the cops. In response, Eugene O'Donnell, a former police officer and prosecutor who is now a professor of police studies at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, told the Associated Press that there is "no magic number," when it comes to officers firing at a suspect.

"When you send the police, they bring deadly force with them. They come armed and they come predisposed to use force," O'Donnell told the AP.

That predisposition to use force may have had some play in the shooting death of Barbara Schneider at the hands of Minneapolis PD officers inside her apartment in June 2000.

Bill Palmer, a senior officer at the scene, recalls the event. "There was a collective 20 or 30 years of law enforcement experience at that door," Palmer reflects. "But none of us had ever had an experience where we faced a person with an edged weapon who wouldn't do exactly what we told them to do. Our paradigm was that we're going to open this door and we're going to engage in a dialogue and we're going to sort it out.

"This resulted in overconfidence. I don't think we understood exactly what the problem was that we were dealing with. And we didn't have a lot of mental health training to prepare for this incident," Palmer says.

Bottlenecked beyond the threshold of the apartment with no room for retreat, Palmer and his fellow officers found themselves having to shoot Schneider when she advanced upon them with a knife.

CONTINUED: Suicide by Cop «   Page 1 of 3   »

Tags: Officer Involved Shootings, Suicide by Cop, Friendly Fire, Officer Psychology


Comments (4)

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

Dottie Hadley @ 12/15/2011 7:35 PM

My son was shop and killed by a SWAT team that planned to kill him

in spite of the fact that they had pick-up papers to put him back in

the hospital. He did have a weapon but was only drunk. The CIT

officer said he was told that if he was suicidal, he was homicidal and

he was not a dangerous person. What can I do from prevent this

from happening to some other unsuspecting person? Why don't they improve the CIT training? My son did not want to die, and the

police had plenty of ways to shoot him. The guns were traded and

he was shot to kill. I do feel very bad when a policeman was killed

here by mentally ill man who killed several people. However, the

police choose their profession, knowing that they are risking their

lives. My son was never given a chance. I'd like to improve CIT

training, but have been unable to access police departments in this

state.

Kevin Nigh @ 1/18/2012 11:02 AM

What are you thinking? "He did have a weapon, but was only drunk." Evidently drunken people can't hurt someone with a weapon where you live, but when you come to the real world, drunk people kill innocent bystanders with weapons every day. "The police had several ways to shoot him." Again, what are you thinking? If he had lived, you would have been the one suing the police for millions for injuring your son. You don't shoot weapons out of people's hands, you shoot center mass, period. For the love of god, step up and take some responsibility yourself. Stop blaming everyone else.

CIT MOM @ 3/1/2012 10:32 AM

To Kevin,

Please understand that the previous commenter has recently lost her son. She is speaking from a place of enormous grief. Grieving people often look for answers and blame themselves as well as others. Civilians are not informed about the dangers of police work in a "real-world" sense. They get their information from television and movies. Put yourself in her shoes and you had just lost your child in this way. She needs to be educated in a respectful way.

Asking this woman to take responsibility for her son's shooting only pours salt in her wound. Its cruel. All mental illnesses do not come from bad parenting. I challenge you to listen to this mother and then ask her to listen to you. A healthy dialogue can go a long way toward facilitating understanding. I respect what police do for us day in and day out. Thank you for what you do to keep us safe.

Derrick Young @ 2/22/2014 8:57 AM

I understand what it means to lose a loved one at the hands of another but the mother must understand that her son, created a situation that really left few choices for most law enforcement officers. When faced with deadly force from an armed combatant, they too have a right to return home to their families also. Welding a handgun and being drunk at the same time is in most cases a death sentence. This is not like a TV show, if you've ever stood down a gun barrel or the potential of it--I'm sure you will quickly understand what they are dealing with. The biggest problem is not that the suspect is armed but the failure to drop the weapon and follow the commands of officers. They really don't want to kill anyone, but they too deserve to see their families again and yes--it's a deadly job. But that doesn't mean they should take extraordinary risk to preserve the life of someone who's a threat to the well-being of others. I'm truly sorry for your loss but I understand the officers too.

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Stories

Leadership in Reverse
Every profession espouses the virtues of leadership. But what about followers, which are...
Body Armor Comfort and Protection
By using a wide variety of new ballistic materials and through proprietary design...
Vehicle Pursuits and Deadly Force
For the third time in 10 years, the U.S. Supreme Court has given us guidance on the kinds...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine