FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual - Bloomberg BNA
This handy 4" x 6" spiral-bound manual offers examples showing how rules are...

Cover Story

Obama and Law Enforcement: What Will He Do?

One of the most liberal presidents in recent U.S. history takes office this month. Will he be good or bad for cops?

January 01, 2009  |  by - Also by this author

As this issue of POLICE arrives in your mailbox, Barack Obama is preparing to become the 44th President of the United States. And if you assembled the other 43 men who have held the office and asked them to give him advice, they would tell him that regardless of what your goal was when you ran for president or the positions of your platform, events shape the presidency more than the presidency shapes events.

Case in point: George W. Bush. The much despised departing President Bush came into office with the goal of healing the divide between Democrats and Republicans and uniting the country. He leaves office with the country more divided than ever.

Such are the perils of the office.

No one knows how Obama's presidency will play out. The only thing we do know is what he has said that he plans to do in the next four years. The following is an examination of what he's said about issues near and dear to American law enforcement and commentary from leading law enforcement experts on how it will affect you.

The Courts

One of the greatest powers of the president is the constitutional duty to nominate justices to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Justices don't serve at the pleasure of the president or at the electoral will of the people. Once seated, they and all federal judges serve until they choose to leave the office, die, or are impeached. Some judges serve for decades. Which means that the choice of Supreme Court judges is often the only lasting legacy of a president's term.

Even before President Obama was elected, pundits and legal scholars were handicapping his court appointments. Experts believe that between now and the time that he runs for re-election in 2012, the new president will have the opportunity to replace two justices. John Paul Stevens, 88, and Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, 75, are expected to retire.

POLICE Magazine legal columnist Devallis Rutledge says that little will change if Obama gets to name replacements for these liberal justices because he would just be replacing liberal with liberal.

"Just replacing Stevens and Ginsburg with people of like philosophy wouldn't make a substantial difference," Rutledge explains. "Where the difference would come is if President Obama gets to nominate a successor for one of the justices who consistently favors law enforcement."

According to Rutledge, right now the court is constituted with four liberals and four conservatives with Justice Anthony Kennedy swinging back and forth. That has been to the benefit of law enforcement.

But if Obama gets to replace a conservative justice, that could end the conservative advantage in many rulings. "Just about everything would be affected if that happens," Rutledge says.

Some examples of what Rutledge believes could happen if a liberal majority is seated in the Supreme Court include:

  • Expanded application of the evidence exclusionary rule
  • Reduced consideration of the "good faith" exception for bad warrants
  • More lawsuits against police officers
  • A prohibition or restriction on the death penalty
  • Three strikes laws could be judged as constituting cruel and unusual punishment

That's a nightmare scenario for law enforcement, but it's unlikely to happen. Like Rutledge says, Obama will probably only be able to swap liberal for liberal. Also, what happens when a judge becomes a Supreme Court justice is anyone's guess. For example, David Souter was nominated by Republican George Herbert Walker Bush, but he's generally voted liberal. So there's no guarantee that a liberal president like Obama will necessarily end up nominating a justice who consistently votes liberal.

Since the Supreme Court is likely to remain largely conservative at least for now, Rutledge says a bigger concern is the lower courts. "The Supreme Court hears 80 to 110 cases per year. Most cases are settled at another level," he says. "There are a lot of openings at the district court and the appeals court levels that the next president will fill. Those judges are set for life, and they will affect a lot more cases because they rule on a lot more cases."

Comments (3)

Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

ROB ROY @ 1/21/2009 9:12 PM

With economy totally screwed up like it is i doubt we have alot to worry about as far as gun control, homeland security and so on. I'am also a gun dealer as my side job, and yes the liberal tri fecta has been good for business..... If these idiot's clean up the mess we call the ecomomy (which we all know thier the one's responsible for putting it in the toilet). We are so SCREWED!!!!

walkin' trails @ 1/22/2009 5:22 AM

Its going to be the next four years. Every badge toter needs to know how to contact his/her elected representatives and make his/her views known, at least as private citizens. I agree that President Obama, best case scenario, will only have the chance to swap liberal for liberal at the Supreme Court. On the other hand, we all expect the conservative justices to stay seated. Hopefully they will enjoy excellent health and be able to serve at least another four years. The wild card in this whole situation is the DNC controlling the Congress. The Senate and House were full of democrats cut from the same cloth as Zell Miller, then we'd feel more secure. The last thing the new president needs is for a liberal agenda to be pressed forth too fast, too soon. A major terrorist attack or an economy that will not improve are not going to help him get reelected. I've been encountering quite a few illegal aliens who can't find work at present, and that might have some bearing on the immigration issue without governmental action. Gun control is one area where we must keep our eyes open, because that one issue will effect us all somewhere down the road. I did not vote for President Obama, but I have no interest in seeing him fail as our leader for the next four years, because if he fails, we hurt.

j706 @ 1/24/2009 11:14 PM

Obama said "he would not support any gun control the the FOP didn't support"? He might have said that but I would bet money that he supports any and all gun control bills that come up! Any takers on the bet?

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Stories

First Tactical: The Refined Tac Pant
"The V2 pant is performance-ready and purpose-built to handle any mission that arises...
Letting Go
Decide to live in the now, dealing with the things you can control.
Who Should Be the HAIX Hero of the Month?
Nominees for HAIX Hero of the Month have been chosen, and now, we want to hear more from...
Two Tools for Field Communications
Two models may help your field conversations, depending on who you're talking to....

Police Magazine