FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual - Bloomberg BNA
This handy 4" x 6" spiral-bound manual offers examples showing how rules are...

Columns : Editorial

When Is a Death Sentence Not a Death Sentence?

If a state never executes anyone, what is the point of it having capital punishment?

February 01, 2008  |  by - Also by this author

Back in December, New Jersey's state officials repealed the death penalty. They didn't use it anyway, so the decision probably had little real effect.

After all, the most infamous denizen of the Garden State's death row was Jesse Timmendequas. And if anybody ever needed killing, this waste of human skin does.

In 1994, the state of New Jersey plopped this monster and his two fellow sex offender roomies into a neighborhood full of unsuspecting people and across the street from the home of seven-year-old Megan Kanka.

Sex offenders, especially child molesters, are extremely difficult to rehabilitate.

Jesse was no exception. And in the twisted wiring that passes for his brain, he found a lust object in seven-year-old Megan. He used the old "Want to see my puppy?" bait line to persuade the little girl to come into his home. He raped her. Smashed her head into a dresser. Strangled her with his belt. And raped her corpse. The next day he confessed to the crime.

Three years later Jesse Timmendequas was convicted of kidnapping, aggravated sexual assault, and murder. He was sentenced to death. And can you think of anybody who deserved the needle more than this guy?

But two months ago, Jesse Timmendequas received a Christmas present when Gov. Jon S. Corzine signed a bill that repealed the state's death penalty. He is now serving life in prison without parole.

I recap this story, not because of some particular desire to explain the origin of Megan's Law, which requires sex offenders to register and is named for Megan Kanka, but to point out the following: This guy was on death row three years longer than Megan Kanka drew breath.

Which begs the question: Did New Jersey even really have a death penalty? I mean even with appeals, Jesse Timmendequas should have been scragged, toe-tagged, and bagged long before the Y2K celebrations. But no one has been executed in the Garden State since 1963. I repeat…1963.

The powers that be in New Jersey had so little support for capital punishment that they didn't even seek it in cop killings. Maybe such a capital punishment-supporting jury could have prevented the travesty of justice that occurred in Newark two months before Gov. Corzine repealed the state's death penalty.

Back in July 2005, Newark Special Officer Dwayne Reeves, 28, was gunned down in front of the high school where he served. At the time, he was trying to handcuff Blood gang enforcer Khalil Tutt, 28, who was intent on attacking a student who had fought with his younger sister.

His trial was held last October. And despite eyewitness testimony that Tutt had killed Reeves, the jury reduced Tutt's first-degree murder charge to reckless manslaughter. Prosecutors believe the jury was intimidated.

Fortunately, justice wasn't totally blind in this case. Superior Court Judge Michael Casale was so pissed by the jury's verdict that he used the jury's guilty verdicts on some ancillary charges to give Tutt 30 years. Of course, Tutt's attorney is appealing the sentence.

Would Tutt have been convicted of murder if the prosecutors had sought the death penalty? Who knows? One thing is certain, however, even if he had been sentenced to face the executioner that day never would have come. And that's true whether the state's death penalty had been repealed or not.

New Jersey didn't have the stones to carry out the death sentences handed down by its capital case juries since 1976. So there was no point in the state having capital punishment.


Request more info about this product / service / company

Be the first to comment on this story

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Stories

Who Should Be the HAIX Hero of the Month?
Nominees for HAIX Hero of the Month have been chosen, and now, we want to hear more from...
Two Tools for Field Communications
Two models may help your field conversations, depending on who you're talking to....
Paying the Price
The migrant caravan brings us multi-faceted problems and costs, and the substantial...

Police Magazine