FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Departments : The Beat

To Serve and Protect?

Sergeant reflects on the different interpretations of a familiar law enforcement adage. To Serve and Protect," is a phrase made famous by the Los Angeles Police DeĀ­partment and adopted, in various forms, by law enforcement agencies across the United States.

December 01, 1998  |  by Sgt. Mike Burg

"To Serve and Protect," is a phrase made famous by the Los Angeles Police De­partment and adopted, in various forms, by law enforcement agencies across the United States.

While what constitutes "protect" may be open to some debate, it seems to be more clear-cut than does the word "serve." It's obvious that we protect the citizens and their property from the criminal element. The word "serve" on the other hand is somewhat ambiguous. What "to serve" may mean to one law enforcement agency it may mean quite the opposite to another. "To serve" also takes on a different meaning depending upon department size. For example, I know a chief in a small village not far from the city where I work. He recently had a call to "assist the woman." We all get these types of calls, but his was to as­sist the woman in re-hanging her draperies! To serve? Is that what people want?   A tax supported drapery service?

U,S, News and World Report (June 17, 1996) ran an interesting cover story entitled, "this is 9-1-1, please hold!" the article showed that the 9-1-1 problem isn't confined to any certain size of department. It is, in fact; nationwide problem that is oblivious to agency size and has a great deal to do with the "to serve" phrase.

I was aware that our agency received numerous non-emergency 9-1-1 calls, but I guess I never looked much past our local government available after 5 p.m. front door. I never realized the magnitude of the problem.  The article stated that 9-1-1 service covers approximately 85 percent of the population. On a daily basis, an average of 268,000 9-1-1 calls are made, 80 to 85 percent of which  are for law enforcement assistance.

U.S. News went on to say that the problem is not the volume of the calls but the fact that an increasingly large percentage of the calls don't fit anyone's definition of an emergency.

People use 9-1-1 because it's there, it's handy and they know they'll get a response. They call in for the time of day, directions and numerous other non- emergencies. We once received a 9-1-1 call from a woman because she hadn't received her Sunday paper!

According to the article, some agencies have reported that on busy nights, some citizens have had to wait up to two hours for officers to respond to non-emergency calls. In response to that, citizens with non-emergencies have been telling 9-1-1 operators that a gun is involved in order to obtain a faster response by the police! It goes on to say, "...in many cities response time is still considered the key test of a police department's effectiveness." So, where do we draw the line?  What separates service from servitude?  Running from call to call vs. community policing?

While the problem may be nationwide in scope, the solutions, I believe, lie within our own jurisdictions.  Oftentimes we must simple tell our citizens that their request is not a police function, but refer them to someone who can help them.  In doing so, perhaps the next time they will call that agency or person first, instead of 9-1-1.

In many small cities, the police are the only visible and accessible arm of the local government available after 5pm and on weekends.  Because of that we become the water department, the street department, the dog warden, etc.--and people begin to expect it from us.

The old saying, "To Protect and to Serve-After Coffee" is a humorous one.  Perhaps it's not so humorous to our colleagues in the larger cities.  The U.S. News article reported that at times, officers' requests for time off to eat were being denied due to the fact that they had too many calls pending!

In order to ease the burden on the patrol officers, some of the larger departments have initiated a system where, if the calls meet certain criteria, they transfer the caller to an officer who will take the report/complaint over the phone.  While I understand the reasoning behind this, I can't help but wonder how many citizens will be happy with this type of response.

I believe that it is essential that officers, in most instances, talk one-on-one with the complainant.  The personal contact not only indicates to the citizens that we are concerned with their problem(s) but also provides opportunities to receive unexpected tips regarding other situations.  Not an uncommon occurrence.

So, if the scenario is to "see the woman," and while you're assisting her in re-hanging her drapes, she tells you about the strange glow from her neighbor's house each night, and in following up on that, you discover a marijuana hydroponics operation...

There is no question that we need to strike a balance between "to serve" and community policing.  Both are beneficial.  We must do both.  And yes, that may sometimes even include helping a woman re-hang her drapes!

Sgt. Mike Burg works with the Rittman (Ohio) Police Department.


Comments (1)

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1

Edward Barnes @ 6/30/2014 5:02 PM

Good story. I will use it in my research and give you credit for your part.
Regards Edward Barnes

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.
Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine