FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Brian Willis

Brian Willis

Brian Willis is a retired officer, trainer and author who now serves as deputy executive director for the International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA).



William Harvey

William Harvey

William "Bill" Harvey is currently serving as chief of police in south central Pennsylvania. He retired from the Savannah (Ga.) Police Department where he worked assignments in training, patrol, and CID. Harvey has more than 25 years of experience working with recruits, rookies, and FTOs.
Training

We Don't Need (Certain) Firearms Instructors

Sometimes teaching shooting just isn't enough.

January 22, 2008  |  by Steve Ashley - Also by this author

I once knew a firearms instructor who'd been to "instructor school" about 20 years before, and was perfectly happy to keep teaching what he learned back then. He was not interested in going to more instructor schools, and he wasn't really interested in discussing new training techniques or information. As far as he was concerned, he was already "certified" as an instructor, and that was that.

I also knew a defensive tactics guy who was actually a martial artist of some repute. In his discipline, he excelled at what he did. He had taken a few "moves" and taught them to officers, and as far as he was concerned, that made him a defensive tactics trainer.

Then there was the guy who…well, you get the idea.

So, do we really not need firearms instructors anymore? Of course we do. We need them more than ever. What we don't need are firearms instructors—or any other instructors—that aren't interested in staying current, or don't want to be cross-trained in other high-risk disciplines. What we need are Force and Control Instructors.

Cross Training: Keeping things in Context

There was a time when we could have a firearms instructor and a defensive tactics (DT) instructor, and maybe even a driving instructor, and they could all teach their respective disciplines, and everything would be fine. Stop me if you've ever heard this one: "All the stuff you learn in your other classes is important, but firearms (or DT or driving, or whatever) is the most important class you'll have." I heard that from several different instructors back in the academy, and even though we were training with flintlock pistols back then, that train of thought stuck with many law enforcement instructors for many years.

In this day and age, that just won't fly. High-risk incidents are dynamic, and officers need training that will equip them to flow smoothly and coherently from one activity to the next, maintaining the contextual linkages between events.

So the traffic stop that turns into a pursuit that turns into a felony stop that turns into a cuff and search procedure is really one event, one that occurs in a multi-phased fashion. That's complicated, and it's made more so when the training that officers get is broken up into separate and distinct chunks, each of which fails to segue smoothly into the next activity.

Because many trainers are recognizing this fact, more and more departments are conducting force-on-force role play scenarios, with scripting and desired outcomes. That's a good thing, and we need more of it.

"But that's expensive and slow," goes the argument, "we can't afford to do that. It takes too much time." So some departments stick with the same format for training they have always had, dozens or scores of repetitions of static drills, given to learn one specific move or method, without context. The question is, is that really the learning model that is most beneficial?

Along this same line, it's not enough for instructors to rely on the "legal instructor" to teach the underlying rationale for the use of force and control. Every trainer that teaches a high-risk discipline—be it firearms, driving, or DT—needs a full and accurate understanding of the legal theory behind forcible control by the police. That material must be interwoven into whatever training officers receive, so that it becomes an integral part of their in-depth understanding of the subject.

When a department wants to take the leap into contextual training, it will need cross-trained instructors. Or at least instructors who are sufficiently trained in other disciplines so that they can put together contextually sound training scenarios, and do so safely and efficiently.

It is therefore incumbent upon instructors to get the training they need to fit this new model, so that their officers will get the best, most job-related training they can deliver. There will always be a need for training in the basic skills of policing, and there is no substitute for traditional methods in that regard. But when we move the "slider" along the continuum from "comfortable, static, and easy" toward "job-related, court-defensible, and contextually valid," we're going to need trainers that have grown beyond their individual disciplines. We're going to need Force and Control Instructors.

Tags: Firearms Training


Comments (4)

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

entryman22 @ 1/22/2008 4:34 PM

I believe that Massachusetts is adopting this method in the near future and will intertwine firearms and DT into "Use of Force". It just makes sense. I know that the new qualifications course incorporates DT into it. Example: 3 yard line weapon holstered; Interview stance facing target, instructor yells "knife", officer simulates a hi-block, shuffle steps back and gains distance, draws firearm and double taps the target, scans, and holsters. It is nice to see things coming together.
Be safe and Godspeed.

newyork911 @ 1/30/2008 2:38 PM

Great article. I have had the pleasure in having a Chief that understands that the teaching of our new and "old" can be taught new tricks. He sent me to DT instructor school and then a year later to Firearms instructor school. It has been 6 years now and during our training, I have gotten with the other instructors and we are doing more "officer survival" training every year during our DT and Firearms. We started doing instructor evaluations after the training, and the general consensus has been, "why have we not been doing stuff like this before". The only obstacle that I am having now is convincing those same people that sent me to the schools, to send me to more that are being taught by different organizations. I understand that the basic stuff is the same, but you can always take something away from it.

ceciliomr@yahoo.com @ 3/8/2008 9:01 PM

Blood was shooting out of my eyes when I saw the title of this article. "I am going to let it have it, as soon as I finish reading it"- I said. Short version - I liked so much that I ended up becoming a subscriber! Firearms instructors address the small tip of the lethal force continuum. It behooves for them (us) to know everything else; starting from the base, for all those matters are going to come up, sooner or later, one way or another. Great article!

jurgenss @ 10/8/2008 2:28 AM

Very true!In my 12 years as Instructor in many fields it became clear that cross training in the use of force is not individual chapters but a flowchart of understanding the big picture.
To be able to transform from one scene to the next and to apply job-related training.
I try to stay informed and updated.This gives my students the edge!Great article!

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.
Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine