FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Bob Parker

Bob Parker

Lt. Robert Parker served with the Omaha (Neb.) PD for 30 years and commanded the Emergency Response Unit. He is responsible for training thousands of law enforcement instructors in NTOA's Patrol Response to Active Shooters courses.



Jose Medina

Jose Medina

Officer Jose Medina is an active member of the Piscataway (N.J.) Police Department's SWAT team and runs Awareness Protective Consultants (Team APC) tactical training.
SWAT

Take Action in Active Shooter Response

How to thwart the growing epidemic of active shooters is one of society's and law enforcement's most daunting challenges to date.

February 28, 2008  |  by Robert O'Brien - Also by this author

Your responses to last week's SWAT column on active shooter response run the gamut of potential solutions. Make no mistake about it, active shooters pose a threat to society not seen since the sniper era of the '60s and '70s. I'm not talking about political terrorists waiting in the wings to attack America—again.

I'm talking about the lone gunmen who, for their own personal reasons, murder until physically stopped. The result is public fear and terror, and a clamor for police to end this growing threat.

America is a "copycat" nation, with imitation the highest form of flattery.

Some of you may remember the "copycat" tragedies whenever the movie "The Deer Hunter" (a powerful movie about the Vietnam War) was aired. One riveting scene was particularly haunting: the "Russian Roulette" scene. Every time the movie aired, somewhere in America, young males played their own version of "Russian Roulette," with tragic results. It took a number of years, and many tragedies, before this deadly game finally waned.

The active shooter phenomenon has a certain "copycat" quality to it — a deadly game won by causing the highest body count in the shortest amount of time before police can stop them.

Last week's SWAT column was a call for action, and a number of you responded with suggestions, including legally armed citizens defending themselves. The rationale is police can't be everywhere, and can't respond rapidly enough to prevent these shootings.

However well intentioned they may be, America is a long way off from authorizing armed citizens in classrooms. In the meantime, the active shooter problem continues, and police remain the primary line of defense against this threat.

That said, there are steps that can, and should, be taken — right now, today.

Get Citizens Involved

Citizens need to get involved and notify authorities if they learn of potential threats. Citizens are our "eyes and ears," our early warning system who alert police and security to deadly threats. This system has already proven effective in high schools and middle schools.

Next is for college campuses, shopping malls, churches, etc. (wherever large gatherings of people occur) to target harden their facilities to make it harder for shooters to gain access to their intended victims. Again, high, middle, and elementary schools have led the way through closed campuses and lockdowns. Schools at all levels have also increased armed security presence, an effective form of target hardening.

College campuses are more like small cities—with spread out campuses, numerous buildings, students, faculty, and visitors—making them difficult to close or lockdown. Even so, many colleges have instituted their form of lockdown and notification of trouble, along with armed campus police or security, resulting in improved target hardening.

Carry Off Duty

The next counter-measure is one that LTC Dave Grossman has been preaching to law enforcement for years. He says if you are legally authorized to carry your firearm, you have a duty to carry it—on and off duty. To emphasize his point, he cites horror stories of unarmed officers who have found themselves in the middle of deadly force situations.

There are many examples of off-duty armed officers being at the right place and time, preventing further shooting tragedies. One that readily comes to mind is the 2006 Salt Lake City mall active shooter. He was interrupted by an armed off-duty officer who diverted the shooter's attention away from his intended victims long enough for Salt Lake City Police to take over.

With the passage of H.R. 218 into federal law, all qualified active and retired law enforcement are legally authorized to carry firearms (with certain restrictions). There are more than one million legally authorized, trained, armed law enforcement officers in America who, by their sworn oath are duty bound to protect the lives of the innocent. Imagine the surprise of the active shooter in Salt Lake City facing the armed response of that off-duty police officer.

First Responder Response

The next counter-measure, adopted in the wake of Columbine, is first responder response to active shooters. This tactic has dramatically improved response time and altered active shooter tactics because time is no longer on their side. A growing number of departments are authorizing their SWAT teams to carry their SWAT gear and weapons at all time to ensure rapid, effective response to active shooter incidents.

America has become a test battleground, a deadly "chess game" between active shooters and law enforcement, with America caught in the middle. Perhaps someday (hopefully sooner, not later) a solution will be found. But until then, law enforcement continues to be society's main line of defense against society's threats—including active shooters.

Like lightning, active shooters can strike anywhere, any time, without warning. We need to follow LTC Dave Grossman's sage advice and always be on the alert, armed and ready to protect.

Tags: Active Shooters


Comments (4)

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

ceciliomr@yahoo.com @ 3/5/2008 6:53 PM

PC is putting restrictions on our open society. Unfortunately those restrictions are placed with the wrong group (read law abiding citizens). When you squeeze a balloon on just one side it creates a swelling in another. Lawless citizens can see this and take the opportunity, knowing that someone, somewhere, somehow, is going to find an excuse for their behavior. And the "squeezing and ballooning" cycle starts allover again. Giving rights to the wrongs and forgiving their behavior, creates this environment... or is a huge contributor. Copycatting is the effect of opening the wrong door to the wrong people. We can do many things after the fact, good and effective, but we need to close that door first!

irishone @ 3/5/2008 10:27 PM

It is all well and good to make the statement that citizen's need to get involved. However, this involvement is a two way street, a quid pro quo if you will. For our involvement, we expect our calls for service to be answered in a professional manner, reports and arrests be taken when necessary and above all, treat us like you would be want to be treated by police where you live.....where I live, you have to argue with deputies to get a report taken and they treat everyone they meet as though they are stupid.....

CAPONER @ 3/6/2008 9:42 AM

Think of what a bloodbath it would be if all students in a class were armed and opened fire on each other when an active shooter situation happened. Not every college kid should be trusted with a gun. It's tough enough for highly trained police officers to avoid making shooting mistakes under stress. Those who argue to let law abiding citizens carry guns as a preventive measure are forgetting that most of our recent shootings were done by people without criminal records. NUTS with GUNS is the problem. If we are not willing to control the NUTS we have to control their access to GUNS somehow. I think that when a citizen can't walk into a church, or a Wendy's without fear of getting shot we may be witnessing the disintregation of our society. In the meantime, COPS, trained to ACT, being alert on and off duty, and a society that salutes them instead of crucifying them for making the tough calls is what we need.

ynotbloom @ 3/6/2008 11:52 AM

I do not think it likely that we will ever see all our citizens armed (nd recent shootings seem to indicate that its pretty hard to pre-disern some of our Nut-population). However, as I have looked a the issue over time, I find a large number of cases where armed citizens have successfully interviened and protected lives with legal weapons. I have yet to hear of any cases of disasters caused by the same (not saying there may not be, but I have yet to hear of them - any my guess is if they were occurring the media hounds would have been all over them). In Wisconsin, some are still arguing that if we ever go to CCW for citizens, we will see these "bloodbath" battles - even thought they don't seem to be happening in the other 48 or so states that have it. Personally, if my kids were at the mall when someone starts one of these rampages, and I and my duty weapon (or my collegues) were not immediately on site, I would be comforted to know that a citizen in good standings might be there with a legal CCW to possibly intervein. Just my 2 cents worth.

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

The Aftermath of Police Encounters with “Unarmed” Individuals--57 Murders
According to the FBI’s online database of officers feloniously killed, as well as the...
We Don't Need to Relax Recruit Fitness Standards, We need to Prepare Candidates Better
Fitness standards should not be lowered to accommodate anyone, male or female. The job is...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine