FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Doug  Wyllie

Doug Wyllie

Doug Wyllie has authored more than 1,000 articles and tactical tips aimed at ensuring that police officers are safer and more successful on the streets. Doug is a Western Publishing Association “Maggie Award” winner for Best Regularly Featured Digital Edition Column. He is a member of International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA), an Associate Member of the California Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA), and a member of the Public Safety Writers Association (PSWA).
November 2018 (3)
October 2018 (4)
September 2018 (3)
August 2018 (6)
July 2018 (4)
June 2018 (3)
April 2018 (1)
March 2018 (2)
January 2018 (1)
September 2017 (1)
August 2017 (1)
May 2017 (1)
April 2017 (1)
January 2017 (1)
November 2016 (1)
September 2016 (1)
June 2016 (2)
May 2016 (3)
April 2016 (2)
March 2016 (1)
February 2016 (3)
January 2016 (1)
December 2015 (1)
November 2015 (5)
October 2015 (1)
September 2015 (3)
August 2015 (3)
July 2015 (6)
June 2015 (3)
May 2015 (2)
April 2015 (3)
March 2015 (5)
February 2015 (1)
January 2015 (1)
December 2014 (9)
October 2014 (2)
September 2014 (2)
August 2014 (2)
July 2014 (1)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (2)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (2)
February 2014 (3)
January 2014 (3)
December 2013 (2)
November 2013 (2)
October 2013 (3)
September 2013 (5)
August 2013 (3)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (4)
April 2013 (3)
March 2013 (5)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (3)
December 2012 (5)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (4)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (5)
July 2012 (4)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (6)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (3)
October 2011 (3)
September 2011 (3)
August 2011 (2)
July 2011 (2)
June 2011 (3)
May 2011 (4)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (5)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (3)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (4)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (5)
August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (4)
June 2010 (4)
May 2010 (4)
April 2010 (3)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (1)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (4)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (2)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (3)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (3)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (2)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (4)
February 2008 (5)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (4)
August 2007 (5)
July 2007 (4)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (5)

How the Threat of Terrorism has Changed Since 9/11

In online recruitment literature and videos, groups like ISIS and al Qaeda have given instructions — while simultaneously radicalizing impressionable young American citizens to participate in jihad — to use simple weapons and tactics to conduct lone-wolf attacks.

September 14, 2018  |  by Doug Wyllie - Also by this author

Embed from Getty Images

Earlier this week, we paused to pay tribute to the Americans who lost their lives in the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

Of the 2,996 people killed, 23 were officers with the New York City Police Department, 343 were firefighters with the New York City Fire Department, and 37 were officers from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Police Department — all of whom perished when the Twin Towers collapsed.

Countless other first responders have died — or soon will die — from 9/11-related disease they contracted by spending months at the hole in the ground where the towers once stood.

This column is written in honor of their memory — as well as for every civilian killed, injured, or who lost a loved one on that terrible day.

We will never forget you.

Changing Landscape

The September 11 attacks were perpetrated by 19 individuals — one of the plotters was unable to participate in the attack because he was repeatedly denied a visa for entry into the United States.

Each of those men made several dry runs on multiple airlines to identify the flights they wanted to take — they were looking for flights that had faraway destinations (more fuel on board) and light passenger manifests (fewer potential counter-attackers).

The 9/11 plotters spent between $400,000 and $500,000 — the overwhelming majority of which was provided directly by al Qaeda either through wire transfers or in cash, according to the 9/11 Commission Report.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed first presented the 9/11 plan to Osama bin Laden sometime in 1996, and in late 1998 or early 1999, OBL gave KSM the go-ahead to proceed. This means that the planning phase would have lasted roughly two and a half years at a minimum — an unknown number of years went into the planning before the green light on the attack.

Why do I bring all of this stuff up?

Because conducting such a complex and costly operation — involving dozens of participants, hundreds of thousands of dollars, and many years of planning — would be next to impossible today.

Now that law enforcement — particularly the FBI — has placed such an emphasis on investigating and thwarting attacks, a plan like the one used on 9/11 would come to the attention of some three-letter agency, and the attackers arrested or killed (depending upon where we found them).

The FBI even stated in 2002 that its number one priority is now to "protect the United States from terrorist attack." And the agency has been largely successful.

For example, in 2003, the FBI learned of a plot to destroy the Brooklyn Bridge, and turned the primary plotter into a double agent who helped the agency investigate other potential plots.

The agency arrested several men who were plotting an attack on the Fort Dix military base in 2007.

A plot to attack an Independence Day Celebration in Cleveland was foiled just this year.

There are dozens of other examples of successful FBI counterterrorism operations — too many to list.

Different Threat

Consequently, the tactics of the major terrorist organizations — ISIS currently being the most dangerous, but al Qaeda, AQAP, Boko Haram, al Shabaab, and Hezbollah certainly remaining relevant — have changed.

In online recruitment literature and videos, groups like ISIS and al Qaeda have given instructions — while simultaneously radicalizing impressionable young American citizens to participate in jihad — to use simple weapons and tactics to conduct lone-wolf attacks.

In one issue of an "online magazine" called Rumiyah — the name refers to an Islamic prophecy that tells of the downfall of Rome and calls for killing infidels — ISIS gives detailed instructions on how to make an attack with an edged weapon.

In one issue of Inspire — an online magazine that has since ceased publication — articles detailed instruction on how an individual or small group can derail a train, saying that it "is a daunting and almost impossible task to protect the long railroad length, and yet one of the easiest to target."

Previous issues of Inspire taught potential self-radicalized jihadis to use vehicles as weapons (which has been done in many places in Europe and a couple of cities in America). They have also advocated for lighting multiple forest fires to create not only dangers to nearby cities, but to draw first responders away from their home jurisdictions so that other attacks may occur with less resistance.

Finally — and probably most importantly — these groups have advocated for the use of small arms such as handguns, rifles, and shotguns to commit mass murder. They are radicalizing disillusioned and disaffected American citizens to become active shooters for Allah.

Consider the following list of attacks conducted on American soil — allegedly by radical Islamic terrorists — in the 17 years since 9/11.

  • 2002 — Shooting at El Al ticket counter at LAX — 2 dead
  • 2002 — D.C. Beltway sniper killings — 10 dead
  • 2006 — Shooting at the Seattle Jewish Federation — 1 dead
  • 2009 — Shooting at Fort Hood — 13 dead
  • 2009 — Shooting at a Little Rock military recruiting office — 1 dead
  • 2013 — Boston Marathon Bombing — 5 dead
  • 2014 — Beheading in an Oklahoma food processing plant — 1 dead
  • 2015 — Shootings at two military facilities in Chattanooga — 5 dead
  • 2015 — The San Bernardino shooting — 14 dead
  • 2016 — The Orlando nightclub shooting — 49 dead

In all but two of the abovementioned attacks, the weapons used were small arms — the outliers were a pair of homemade pressure cooker bombs (constructed using instructions published in Inspire Magazine) and an edged weapon (following instructions in Rumiyah Magazine).

This brings me to state, county, and municipal law enforcement — police agencies I intentionally ignored when talking about the success of the FBI's efforts above.

Cops on the streets are the frontline defense against an active shooter attack. It is this level of law enforcement that "runs to the sound of the guns" when an active killer is murdering innocents.

Sidebar: It would be helpful if police got an occasional assist from the co-workers, teachers, family members, and neighbors who are most likely to be close enough to a person susceptible to becoming radicalized enough to become violent against Americans and report them to police.

But that's another matter entirely.

On the topic of an active shooter attack committed by a radicalized Islamist jihadist…

Be advised that a truly committed fighter might have a higher level of tactical capability — and certainly a higher level of motivation — than another active shooter.

They might have had access to online training from a magazine like Rumiyah or Inspire.

They might have had training from any one of countless legitimate firearms training companies here in the United States.

They might have had training — and potentially even battlefield experience — in places like Iraq, Syria, Somalia, or some other "vacation spot" in sandland.

Terrorist Goals

The FBI defines terrorism as "the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."

Translated, a terrorist wants to change the behavior of a targeted group of people, and uses violence — or the threat of violence — in order to accomplish that goal.

The fact of the matter is that the behavior of a very specific group of Americans has been changed by the looming threat of terrorist attack — but I posit that this particular change is for the better.

First and foremost, American law enforcement is now far more vigilant for signs of a terror attack than it was on the 10th of September 2001.

Further, American police are considerably more active in hunting plotters of attacks and arresting them.

Finally, we — as a nation — are also more likely to unleash the dogs of war in the aftermath of an attack on American soil and/or American interests overseas.

These outcomes are all good things.

God bless America.

Be the first to comment on this story

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

Recharging Your Batteries: The Benefits of "Unplugging"
There is certainly benefit to being current on events involving the people you consider...
Speaking on the Unspeakable: Ending the Pandemic of Police Officer Suicide
I've talked with officers who have lost a colleague to suicide—as well as many widows of...

Police Magazine