FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Autonomous Robots Prevent Crime

Ask The Expert

Stacy Dean Stephens

VP Marketing & Sales

Doug  Wyllie

Doug Wyllie

Doug Wyllie has authored more than 1,000 articles and tactical tips aimed at ensuring that police officers are safer and more successful on the streets. Doug is a Western Publishing Association “Maggie Award” winner for Best Regularly Featured Digital Edition Column. He is a member of International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA), an Associate Member of the California Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA), and a member of the Public Safety Writers Association (PSWA).
July 2018 (2)
June 2018 (3)
April 2018 (1)
March 2018 (2)
January 2018 (1)
September 2017 (1)
August 2017 (1)
May 2017 (1)
April 2017 (1)
January 2017 (1)
November 2016 (1)
September 2016 (1)
June 2016 (2)
May 2016 (3)
April 2016 (2)
March 2016 (1)
February 2016 (3)
January 2016 (1)
December 2015 (1)
November 2015 (5)
October 2015 (1)
September 2015 (3)
August 2015 (3)
July 2015 (6)
June 2015 (3)
May 2015 (2)
April 2015 (3)
March 2015 (5)
February 2015 (1)
January 2015 (1)
December 2014 (9)
October 2014 (2)
September 2014 (2)
August 2014 (2)
July 2014 (1)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (2)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (2)
February 2014 (3)
January 2014 (3)
December 2013 (2)
November 2013 (2)
October 2013 (3)
September 2013 (5)
August 2013 (3)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (4)
April 2013 (3)
March 2013 (5)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (3)
December 2012 (5)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (4)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (5)
July 2012 (4)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (6)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (3)
October 2011 (3)
September 2011 (3)
August 2011 (2)
July 2011 (2)
June 2011 (3)
May 2011 (4)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (5)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (3)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (4)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (5)
August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (4)
June 2010 (4)
May 2010 (4)
April 2010 (3)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (1)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (4)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (2)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (3)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (3)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (2)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (4)
February 2008 (5)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (4)
August 2007 (5)
July 2007 (4)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (5)
Patrol

What Does the FBI’s Latest Study on Active Shooters Really Mean?

Hopefully the document serves to better educate the public about their pivotal role in preventing future tragedies from happening.

July 06, 2018  |  by Doug Wyllie - Also by this author

Embed from Getty Images

In late June, the FBI released what it called Phase Two of the agency’s ongoing examination of active killer events that took place between 2000 and 2013. In Phase One of the study, researchers focused on the circumstances of the active shooting events — location, duration, and resolution of the attacks — but did not attempt to identify the offenders’ motives or any “observable pre-attack behaviors.”

The objective of the latest report “was to examine specific behaviors that may precede an attack and which might be useful in identifying, assessing, and managing those who may be on a pathway to deadly violence.”

How successful was the FBI's latest effort?

More importantly, who should be the primary audience for the findings?

Confirmation of Existing Assumptions

Law enforcement officers — especially those who have had firsthand experience in responding to an active killer incident, or investigating one after the fact — have enough experiential knowledge to draw some subjective conclusions about these offenders.

Consider some of our current, pre-existing assumptions about active killers:

  • Are single males (not in a romantic relationship) at the time of the attack
  • Had some manner of grievance against one or more individuals at the attack location
  • Experienced mental health issues just prior to (or at the time of) the attack
  • Spent at least some time planning their attack (at times even threatening its imminence)
  • Exhibited behaviors that (after the fact) could be construed as pre-attack indicators

The FBI sought in this latest study to examine data culled from 63 separate incidents to determine the accuracy of those assumptions.

Unsurprisingly, our suppositions turned out to be pretty accurate.

According to the FBI, three quarters of the subjects spent a “week or longer planning their attack.” Only a quarter of those included in the study were diagnosed with a mental illness, but almost all were “experiencing multiple stressors (an average of 3.6 separate stressors) in the year before they attacked.”

Those stressors include “financial pressures, physical health concerns, interpersonal conflicts with family, friends, and colleagues (work and/or school), mental health issues, criminal and civil law issues, and substance abuse.”

Importantly, the FBI said that mental health “is not synonymous with a diagnosis of mental illness.”

Undiagnosed conditions such as depression, anxiety, and paranoia may be witnessed by people close to the attacker, and either addressed directly with the individual, or reported to authorities.

The FBI said that on average, active killers displayed four to five “concerning behaviors over time that were observable to others around the shooter” such as problematic interpersonal communications, and/or “leakage of violent intent.”

The FBI said, “In the weeks and months before an attack, many active shooters engage in behaviors that may signal impending violence. While some of these behaviors are intentionally concealed, others are observable and — if recognized and reported — may lead to a disruption prior to an attack.”

Citizens on the Front Lines

This means that some of the most important players in the prevention of a mass killing are not sworn law enforcement officers — they are the co-workers, teachers, family members, and neighbors who are most likely to be close enough to the attacker to pick up on the tell-tale pre-attack indicators.

The trouble is, those individuals may not fully understand the behavior they’re seeing to be warning signs of impending violence. What’s worse, friends and family may even delay — or outright resist — reporting their observations to law enforcement because they don’t want to falsely accuse an individual of being a potential killer.

They may hear an individual utter some expression of violent ideation — whether verbal, non-verbal, or written — and chalk it up to “being nothing.”

They may even ignore outright threats of violent action.

The report said, “The successful prevention of an active shooting frequently depends on the collective and collaborative engagement of varied community members: law enforcement officials, teachers, mental health care professionals, family members, threat assessment professionals, friends, social workers, school resource officers…and many others. A shared awareness of the common observable behaviors demonstrated by the active shooters in this study may help to prompt inquiries and focus assessments at every level of contact and every stage of intervention.”

Law enforcement leaders must find ways to empower people to report their concerns. Police must educate the public about the warning signs to watch for. Officers and investigators also have to treat every reported concern seriously.

The FBI’s recent report revealed very little that law enforcement professionals didn’t already know.

However, it may not be police who are the primary beneficiaries of this new report.

Hopefully the document serves to better educate the public about their pivotal role in preventing future tragedies from happening.


Be the first to comment on this story





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

How Protesters and Politicians Helped Increase Baltimore's Violent Crime
De-policing is an outcome — it is the direct result of protesters, politicians, and the...
How Can Law Enforcement Mitigate the Opioid Crisis in America?
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), more than 115 people die by...

Police Magazine