FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Doug  Wyllie

Doug Wyllie

Doug Wyllie has authored more than 1,000 articles and tactical tips aimed at ensuring that police officers are safer and more successful on the streets. Doug is a Western Publishing Association “Maggie Award” winner for Best Regularly Featured Digital Edition Column. He is a member of International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA), an Associate Member of the California Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA), and a member of the Public Safety Writers Association (PSWA).
October 2018 (3)
September 2018 (3)
August 2018 (6)
July 2018 (4)
June 2018 (3)
April 2018 (1)
March 2018 (2)
January 2018 (1)
September 2017 (1)
August 2017 (1)
May 2017 (1)
April 2017 (1)
January 2017 (1)
November 2016 (1)
September 2016 (1)
June 2016 (2)
May 2016 (3)
April 2016 (2)
March 2016 (1)
February 2016 (3)
January 2016 (1)
December 2015 (1)
November 2015 (5)
October 2015 (1)
September 2015 (3)
August 2015 (3)
July 2015 (6)
June 2015 (3)
May 2015 (2)
April 2015 (3)
March 2015 (5)
February 2015 (1)
January 2015 (1)
December 2014 (9)
October 2014 (2)
September 2014 (2)
August 2014 (2)
July 2014 (1)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (2)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (2)
February 2014 (3)
January 2014 (3)
December 2013 (2)
November 2013 (2)
October 2013 (3)
September 2013 (5)
August 2013 (3)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (4)
April 2013 (3)
March 2013 (5)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (3)
December 2012 (5)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (4)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (5)
July 2012 (4)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (6)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (3)
October 2011 (3)
September 2011 (3)
August 2011 (2)
July 2011 (2)
June 2011 (3)
May 2011 (4)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (5)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (3)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (4)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (5)
August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (4)
June 2010 (4)
May 2010 (4)
April 2010 (3)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (1)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (4)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (2)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (3)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (3)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (2)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (4)
February 2008 (5)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (4)
August 2007 (5)
July 2007 (4)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (5)

Getting Schooled

Your mind can be the most important tool you carry on the job. But far too often officers act before they think.Your mind can be the most important tool you carry on the job. But far too often officers act before they think.

December 04, 2013  |  by - Also by this author

I hate when I realize that I have been had; worse still, manipulated.

Not that I shouldn't know better. I should. As one has to consider the source, my critical thinking cap should have been stretched taunt over my ears the moment I read of the arrest of a Tennessee man for standing outside a school to pick up his son. Instead, my visceral response was: What the F was the officer thinking?

Whatever else, the more pissed off I find myself getting over a matter, the more I am inclined to obsess about it. So after my first wave of WTFs had subsided and my contemplated "spirit of the law" rants had ebbed, I tried to read between the lines. In dealing with any journalist's filtrate, it's important to consider what isn't being communicated as much as what is. And so I pulled the reins on myself, slowed to a trot, and surveyed the lay of the land. Namely, I watched the video.

The black-and-white aspects of the story appear to be:

1. The school where the arrest took place recently implemented a new-and-improved student pick-up policy, which dictates that parents can only pick up their children after 2 p.m. by waiting in a line of cars until everyone is released at 2:35 p.m.

2. A father had arrived at the school prior to the dismissal time in a bid to wait on foot for his son.

3. A conversation of sorts occurred between the father and officer. (What with all the interrupting taking place—mostly by the officer—I don't think “Robert's Rules of Order” were in play.)

4. The father was arrested for disturbing the peace.

I routinely allow my emotions to undermine me on a variety of fronts. But I draw the line at implicating others into my actions. As much as someone may have pissed me off when I was on duty, I didn't create crap to take them to jail. This is because I believe that the more secure a man is in the sagacity of his logic, the more at peace a man can be and the more tempered his actions will be. But in watching the video I find little in the way of tempered logic, compassion, or professionalism. As any patron of this blog will attest, belaboring the point is not beyond me. But the video speaks for itself.

And all I can do is wonder: WTF was that cop thinking?

Thinking about the cop not thinking got me to thinking about thinking.

Divorced of the emotional aggravations that may cloud it, thinking is what carries us successfully from one day to the next, on duty and off. In some sense, we rely on shortcuts, training, and educating ourselves as to all manner of protocol to deal with a variety of concrete situations. But often we don't know what those situations are until we find ourselves enmeshed in them. In the meantime, we may find ourselves relying upon inferences, speculations, and playing “what if…?” in trying to anticipate just what we might find ourselves dealing with.

Defining these processes has been problematic, particularly to those outside the profession who give little credence to what might otherwise be ascribed to our subjective interpretations, inferences, and intuitions.

But our world—our lab—is dependent upon looking at things through various paradigms and exploring the inductive, the deductive, and the reductive. We do it rolling to the call, making contact, and conducting interviews. It's exercised during the contemplation of what we see, what we're told, and what the rest of our senses are picking up. When this process is presented in the form of fiction such as in the case of a certain Baker Street resident named Holmes, it's the stuff of commercial success. In reality, it may prove too abstract for those incapable of getting themselves out of jury duty, and is rarely given equal time in the press.

It’s sad but true that most people tend to shy away from being conspicuous about their thinking lest they come across as a “know-it-all.” And yet the people they seek not to offend will cut them no slack for that consideration. And in the hierarchy of transgressions, we never pay more than when we pay for the unsatisfactory explanation. Sometimes it’s smart to be smart, act smart, and explain accordingly.

When you watch that video, put yourself in the shoes of the officer involved and ask yourself how comfortable you would feel articulating the thoughts that you were entertaining in taking such actions.

Then ask yourself: What would I have done? And: Why would I have done it?

Be the first to comment on this story

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

Why Schools Should Teach Students about Policing and Constitutional Law
I've long held the belief that a year-long civics class should be a requirement...
Training School Teachers and Administrators to Respond to Active Killers
Very few people who get into teaching have the mental, emotional, or physical fortitude to...
IACP 2018: Watching Trump's Speech to Law Enforcement
Trump slammed the Obama administration for restricting law enforcement's acquisition of...

Police Magazine