FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Mark Clark

Mark Clark

Mark Clark is the public information officer for a law enforcement agency in the southwest. He is also a photographer and contributor to POLICE Magazine.
Patrol

How the Rodney King Riot Changed the LAPD

The LAPD is a vastly different department 20 years after four officers were acquitted of excessive force in the Rodney King case.

April 27, 2012  |  by Greg Meyer

Photo: Glynn Martin, Los Angeles Police Museum
Photo: Glynn Martin, Los Angeles Police Museum

Sunday marks the 20th anniversary of the Los Angeles riot that followed the acquittal of four Los Angeles Police Department officers who were prosecuted by the state for using excessive force on Rodney King. There was extensive looting and burning, and 53 people lost their lives.

What happened in the King incident? And in the two decades since the riot, how has the LAPD changed?

Those seeking to understand the Rodney King incident should make no mistake about Mr. King and what happened the night of March 3, 1991. The undisputed facts—established by three jury trials, two criminal and one civil—are these: King was a drunken paroled robber, briefly out of prison and by his own testimony intent on not going back. He led police on a lengthy chase, driving in excess of 100 mph. His two passengers (also African-American males) surrendered without any use of force.

During the traffic stop, King exhibited bizarre behavior. He was profusely sweating and dancing around. He pushed away four officers before the video began and before any significant force was used on him. He was not struck while handcuffed. In short, Mr. King was something more than what the media calls "a motorist." Still, he should never have been subjected to the tactics we saw on the video.

In the early 1980s, some Los Angeles officials predicted that baton beatings would result from the LAPD's policy change that banned the most widely used police tactic—the carotid control hold. Several suspects had died while in police custody during the late 1970s and early 1980s, just as they do today due to "excited delirium," regardless of the police tools or tactics used.

On May 12, 1982, the city took away the carotid hold from LAPD's use-of-force options. The baton became the primary control option. Months later, Police Chief Daryl F. Gates reported huge increases in injuries to suspects and officers but his request to modify the policy fell on deaf political ears. A huge gap in the police use-of-force continuum was created, and it was not adequately filled. The stage was set for Rodney King and thousands of less famous resisting suspects to be subjected to injury risks far higher than the carotid hold.

Some have theorized that the King beating was a frenzied, undisciplined, post-pursuit administration of curbstone justice. Had that been the case, the stereotypical scenario is that the accused officers would have run up to the car, pulled the driver out, and the beating would be on. The King incident did not occur that way.

The officers cautiously deployed, gave appropriate commands, and tried several less injurious tactics that failed before escalating to the baton. Even the baton was used in a way that both the judge and the prosecution's own use-of-force expert acknowledged was appropriate and within policy. If you look closely at the first few seconds of the video, you'll see King's right cheek bounce hard off the asphalt during his second TASER fall. He was not hit in the head with Officer Powell's baton, as is widely believed.

After the acquittal at the state trial, and after the riot, Sgt. Stacey Koon and Officer Laurence Powell were convicted of civil rights violations in federal court, and they were sent to prison.

A federal civil jury awarded King $3.8 million in tax dollars from the Los Angeles city treasury for general damages, and not a dime for punitive damages. The jury learned during the punitive-damages phase that the roots of the King beating were to be found in post-carotid-hold training that encouraged LAPD officers who encountered resisting suspects to hit them with police batons.

Most people are surprised to learn that nearly all the procedures caught on the King video tape were deemed proper by use-of-force experts who testified on both sides of the case. The federal judge ruled that only the final seconds were excessive.

The mainstream media failed miserably to explain why the Rodney King beating occurred. The increasing proliferation of video cameras guarantees that more and more police incidents will be captured. But the truth almost always lies deeper than the video.

How has the LAPD changed in 20 years? Ask a hundred people, and you'll likely get a hundred answers.

Here are five:

  • Shortly after the riot, Chief Willie Williams was sworn in as the first outside police chief in 45 years. The voters created a new system where the chief could serve only a five-year term, renewable once at the city's option. On two occasions so far, the city has sent the chief packing after five years.
  • "Community policing" has taken hold in ways not seen in the past. The LAPD diversified to the point where Caucasian officers have been in the minority for many years. The city is on the verge of becoming majority Latino, and so is the department.
  • The role of the civilian police commission (which had been the "boss" of the chief of police for many decades) was intensified, and an independent inspector general position was created.
  • Use of force, whether minor or major, receives intense investigative scrutiny and command review. The TASER, pepper spray, and beanbag shotguns are used in greater numbers of incidents.  (A less-powerful TASER was used twice in the King incident with limited success.) Baton use is minimal.
  • More than 2,000 additional officers were hired in an effort to achieve a (not yet realized) goal of 10,000.

Lou Cannon's "Official Negligence: How Rodney King and the Riots Changed Los Angeles and the LAPD", published in 1997, is the best book I've read on the subject. Its conclusion is worth quoting: "The incident had changed the way Los Angeles thought about its police force, and in time it had changed the police force itself."

Greg Meyer is a retired LAPD captain and a member of the POLICE Advisory Board. He had several involvements in the investigation and litigation of the King case.

Related:

My Memories of the Rodney King Riots? Rage and Frustration

What Really Happened During the Rodney King Riots

Tags: LAPD, Rodney King Arrest, Rioters


Comments (8)

Displaying 1 - 8 of 8

Tschako @ 4/30/2012 11:06 PM

Ho, Hum. What a lousy thing to commemorate. The media here in So. Cal won't let it go.

Random @ 5/1/2012 12:47 AM

You really can't blame the media for wanting to commemorate this event. This was a great day for media. It was a time of easy reporting, listening audience, and an opportunity to blame LEO with complete impunity.

Pat @ 5/1/2012 6:28 AM

Excellent article. I also have read the book "CHIEF" by Daryl Gates and Diane Shaw which goes into more depth than can be given in an article. I recommend both.

Rick @ 5/1/2012 6:37 AM

22 murders remain unsolved out of that riot and all because he wouldn't follow commands to get arrested. The article leaves out the fact that the female CHP officer on scene was so scared that she started to draw her weapon to shoot King and Sgt. Coon stopped her, telling her that LAPD had the most officers and that they'd deal with King. I bet he regretted that decision.

Capt David-Ret LA County @ 5/1/2012 5:18 PM

Also the 42nd anniversary of the imprisonment of Deputy Robert Shaffer for 2nd degree murder. Read at www.whenlawmenlie.com and share with your friends.

Madstructor @ 5/2/2012 8:18 AM

Now I have heard it all- never heard that spin put on the stop before. Rick- where on earth did you get that story about the CHP officer. Have you watched or listened to or read her testimony at the trial?
King submitted to her commands and was lying flat on his stomach his arms spread and she approached to within several feet of his left ankle, yes with her gun still drawn, but she stated she was about to put it away and get her cuffs out to place them on King when ordered to back off By Sgt. Koon. l in my day as a cop she was following what was textbook procedure.
I think everyone in law enforcement should see and hear the testimony of the officers involved in the incident. There were about 21 cops that were witness the beating plus the taser operator Sgt. Koon. 3 testified that what they saw was wrong, (including one of those charged) and 9 testified they saw nothing wrong with what was done. That was enough to create confusion and a reasonable doubt in a laypersons mind. SOP for a defense.
There is a lot more to this than just a drunk driver resisting arrest and the escalation and de-escalation of proper use of force.

Mike @ 5/6/2012 4:46 PM

The guy's a multiple felon by his own admission! He beat his wife in 1987! He robbed a store and assaulted the clerk in 1989! He was high as a kite on PCP! He led 2 CHP officers on a 115 MPH chase! He was pulled over by the 2 officers and his friends cooperated but he didn't! 5 LAPD officer had to assist and he attacked them! He attacked police officers! That's the bottom line and, because he's black, he walked! Plus we some yahoo filming it only half-way so all we saw was them hitting him! This "poor guy" who beat his beat wife, robbed and assaulted a store clerk, and went almost 5x the speed limit in a neighborhood! Thank God he didn't kill anyone! Had he hit some white kid people wouldn't care! Had the officers been black and he hit some black kid people would only care about the kid! Had the colors been switched completely and he run over some black kid a race riot would erupted on the spot! Did they go overboard? Yes. Do I sympathize with him? No. Why was this only filmed? He's black and the majority of the officers are white? Was a aquittal warranted. Yes. Why? Only 4 were charged with anything. Is a riot warranted? Never! To call a riot a expression of rage is such a copout! It's opportunism at its worse! It's a bunch of people finding any excuse they can to go loot a bunch of stores! The fact is the blacks started it and everyone else joined in! These people ripped off their own neighborhoods! All that reflects is these people have absolutely no respect for the laws (which are based on the 10 Commandments) and absolutely no sense of community! All that proves is they don't share our values! The 3.8 million tax dollars awarded to him was a waste of money! Had I lived in LA I'd have raised hell at the city hall. If the colors were switched we wouldn't even be talking about this right now!

Kelly @ 11/29/2012 5:01 PM

@Mike
These people? Do you mean black people?
Your commentary shows ignorance. Please refrain from embarrassing yourself like this in a public forum.

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

"Unarmed" Suspects and Un-brained Media
Few if any pseudo-journalists or pseudo-pundits on the nightly news have bothered to...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine