FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Anonymous Cop

Anonymous Cop

Anonymous Cop is a veteran police officer in a big city Midwestern police department.



Mark Clark

Mark Clark

Mark Clark is the public information officer for a law enforcement agency in the southwest. He is also a photographer and contributor to POLICE Magazine.
May 2015 (2)
April 2015 (3)
March 2015 (5)
February 2015 (1)
January 2015 (1)
December 2014 (9)
October 2014 (2)
September 2014 (2)
August 2014 (2)
July 2014 (1)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (2)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (2)
February 2014 (3)
January 2014 (3)
December 2013 (2)
November 2013 (2)
October 2013 (3)
September 2013 (5)
August 2013 (3)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (4)
April 2013 (3)
March 2013 (5)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (3)
December 2012 (5)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (4)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (5)
July 2012 (4)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (6)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (3)
October 2011 (3)
September 2011 (3)
August 2011 (2)
July 2011 (2)
June 2011 (3)
May 2011 (4)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (5)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (3)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (4)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (5)
August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (4)
June 2010 (4)
May 2010 (4)
April 2010 (3)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (1)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (4)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (2)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (3)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (3)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (2)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (4)
February 2008 (5)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (4)
August 2007 (5)
July 2007 (4)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (5)
Patrol

A Picture is Worth 1,000 Words…And Maybe Some Punitive Time Off

Exercising your morbid curiosity on the job is insensitive to the victims and survivors, and it can get you into serious trouble.

January 24, 2011  |  by - Also by this author

On February 2, 1983, I was part of a group of Los Angeles County Sheriff's academy cadets that toured the County morgue. The rationale given by our drill instructors was that it would help desensitize us to the inevitable trauma we'd encounter later working patrol.

And so we walked from one coroner's room to the next and from one freezer to another. We smelled death and chemicals. We saw dead bodies in various states of dress and distress. We witnessed autopsies.

Forever locking in many of the day's images was an event that actually occurred two days later: pop singer Karen Carpenter's death. With it came the realization that the body of the girl who'd so beautifully sang "Close to You" and "We've Only Just Begun" would be handled just as unceremoniously as the others I had seen. Somehow, it didn't seem right.

But there was something else that registered with me, as well: a gallery of photographs posted on a wall.

Sandwiched between images of bloated and naked bodies of overdosed celebrities such as Janis Joplin and John Belushi were photographs of victims of some of L.A.'s most infamous killers, including the Skid Row Slasher. The Sunset Strip Killers, the Hillside Strangler, and Charles Manson.

Nothing during my subsequent career with the sheriff's department gave me reason to indict the wisdom of such tours; I believe it did desensitize some deputies enough that they didn't freeze up or fixate on subordinate concerns when exposed to similar scenes in the field. But long after I'd forgotten other horrors since encountered, I can still see those morgue pictures.

Why had they been taken and posted on those walls? A peculiar desire for coroner's employees to show off what they'd borne witness to? A means of leveling the playing field between the rich and poor after death? Or was it merely a desire to appease another's odd curiosity?

As years have passed, I have more and more subscribed to the possibility of the latter. Hell, the success of my lead herein hinges on exploiting a reader's morbid intrigue. Really, I could be more to the point, no?

Well, let me get to it then.

Many people, whether or not they want to admit it, have a peculiar fascination with dead bodies-cops included.

This was particularly true of me in my youth. While it's not a particular fun or pleasant thing to acknowledge — let alone discuss — it's the truth. And I am being no less candid when I say that I wish I could eradicate some images from my memory: Caveat spectator.

If Socrates thought the unexamined life wasn't worth living, it would appear that some cops believe the unexamined death isn't worth dying for. If you've worked patrol for any period of time, you've seen them, rolling by your crime and accident scene to examine the sad aftermath of some sentient creature's preternatural demise.

But I do hope such cops think twice before whipping out their handy dandy iPhone camera and taking pictures of the sight that greets them.

More than one cop has already gotten himself in trouble for such lapses in judgment.

Pictures taken by a California Highway Patrolman of Nikki Catsouras' mangled body ended up on the internet, precipitating the loss of jobs, filing of lawsuits, and some all around bad publicity for the department.

Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey similarly condemned one of his subordinates for personal photos at a particularly gruesome accident scene.

"I think it's pretty sick to take pictures of crime scenes when it's not part of your job," Ramsey said. "It's ghoulish."

I wish I could in all good conscience speak with similar outrage. But I can't. Back in the eighties, I kept a Polaroid camera with me, and so this is once again the wino telling you not to drink instead of the preacher.

Even if one could somehow rationalize his way around such ghoulish behavior, it carries with it too many risks. And one day, regardless of whether or not such pictures fall into the wrong hands or cause yourself any other grief, you may well regret taking them. I know I do. Besides being grossly insensitive on my part, it was also stupid and immature, and it would be no less so now.

I try not to be too pious on things because throughout my life I've committed some of the biggest bone-headed mistakes that a person can make. I just hope that one day someone out there reading this will think twice before starting his own morbid collection.

For with age and maturity, he may reevaluate having taking such photo's and have a difficult time reconciling such acts with his humanity

And believe me, that prospect ain't a pretty picture.

Related:

Crime Scene Photos: Show Some Common Decency

Tags: Cops Online, Crime Scenes, Professional Image


Comments (1)

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1

Mark @ 1/24/2011 7:51 PM

Good points Dean, as usual. It is only later, removed from the daily grind of police work that one can assess their career. I think only when we are far removed from that strain and back among civilians in our day-to-day lives that some of what we did creates guilt or shame. I don't think I ever did anything unethical while I was on the job. Years later, somethings I'm not so clear about. I've talked to other retirees about this and they feel the same way. None of us believe we did anything terrible as cops, but we all have uneasy feelings about things we did younger cops that in the light of experience and maturity gives us pause. The polaroid you carried was probably like mine; a few other cops may have shared a picture I or others probably shouldn't have taken. However, in today's instant access to everything, once posted to a social network site, it is on the Internet forever and careers are terminated and victim's families become victims once more. We survive with gallows humor the horrors of what people do to one another. We shield our families from it as we should. We must consider the people most affected by such tragedies and not victimize them when it is we who must protect them. Just don't do it to paraphrase Nike. Just don't do it.

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

What's Missing from the National Narrative on Improving Police Community Relations
Where is the public's ownership of these poor life decisions? Why aren't the parents, the...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine