FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Doug  Wyllie

Doug Wyllie

Doug Wyllie has authored more than 1,000 articles and tactical tips aimed at ensuring that police officers are safer and more successful on the streets. Doug is a Western Publishing Association “Maggie Award” winner for Best Regularly Featured Digital Edition Column. He is a member of International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA), an Associate Member of the California Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA), and a member of the Public Safety Writers Association (PSWA).
November 2018 (3)
October 2018 (4)
September 2018 (3)
August 2018 (6)
July 2018 (4)
June 2018 (3)
April 2018 (1)
March 2018 (2)
January 2018 (1)
September 2017 (1)
August 2017 (1)
May 2017 (1)
April 2017 (1)
January 2017 (1)
November 2016 (1)
September 2016 (1)
June 2016 (2)
May 2016 (3)
April 2016 (2)
March 2016 (1)
February 2016 (3)
January 2016 (1)
December 2015 (1)
November 2015 (5)
October 2015 (1)
September 2015 (3)
August 2015 (3)
July 2015 (6)
June 2015 (3)
May 2015 (2)
April 2015 (3)
March 2015 (5)
February 2015 (1)
January 2015 (1)
December 2014 (9)
October 2014 (2)
September 2014 (2)
August 2014 (2)
July 2014 (1)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (2)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (2)
February 2014 (3)
January 2014 (3)
December 2013 (2)
November 2013 (2)
October 2013 (3)
September 2013 (5)
August 2013 (3)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (4)
April 2013 (3)
March 2013 (5)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (3)
December 2012 (5)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (4)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (5)
July 2012 (4)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (6)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (3)
October 2011 (3)
September 2011 (3)
August 2011 (2)
July 2011 (2)
June 2011 (3)
May 2011 (4)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (5)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (3)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (4)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (5)
August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (4)
June 2010 (4)
May 2010 (4)
April 2010 (3)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (1)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (4)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (2)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (3)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (3)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (2)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (4)
February 2008 (5)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (4)
August 2007 (5)
July 2007 (4)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (5)

Don't Drug Test Cops

Testing patrol officers and deputies is a waste of time and money.

July 07, 2010  |  by - Also by this author

Photo via A.Curell (

Next to the kind of fiscal hemorrhaging popularized by Congress, I have a difficult time imagining a bigger waste of time and money than the drug testing of cops.

The occasional Raphael Perez notwithstanding—which happened to be more a problem of negligent hiring in the first place; the guy was known to be a less-than-ideal candidate at the time of his hiring by LAPD—I believe cops just don't take, toke, or smoke anything they're not supposed to.

It follows that I was both amazed and appalled when the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department first announced that they were going to conduct random urine testing of its sworn personnel to detect evidence of narcotics usage.

At the time, it seemed to me that the department had more pressing concerns. Like the parade of s***-faced administrators renowned for fleeing from local PDs and rear-ending Chippies.

I also thought it odd that the same people who were routinely recognized by the court system as drug experts should suddenly be presumed by their own agency as incapable of divining that their bookman was whacked. That the law enforcement uniform might immediately render a narcotic abuser invisible to his fellow cops (also known as the Friggin' Clark Kent Pair of Sunglasses Phenomenon).

And yet, an old friend of mine proved impervious to such cloaking devices when, shortly after his promotion, he recognized a custody deputy as being under the influence of heroin. Chasing his fellow employee's ass down to the men's room, he caught up with the dude just as the guy tried to flush his hype kit.

But the department apparently thought my friend was the exception and that a majority of its personnel wouldn't recognize such symptoms, and so it stuck with the Pee Police.

Periodically—usually while relieving my bladder under the watchful eye of some pee collector—I'd ask about the success of the program.

Time and again I was told of the remarkably low percentage of positive tests results; picture a decimal mark, followed by a zero or two, then some single-digit number. This was taken as proof that even if our characters were not wholly unassailable, we were by and large drug free (and of those testing positive, most were for marijuana, a substance that may yet be voted legal and whose reputation seems exorbitant relative to the damages wrought by alcohol or tobacco).

Eventually, I expressed my concerns to someone higher up in the organization. With just a hint of condescension, he advised me that the practice was a huge public relations boon.

"Think about it," he told me. "People don't have any basis for accusing the department's personnel of abusing drugs!"

Hmmm. All I could think was, who gives a rat's ass what kind of spurious allegations some jerk makes of our employees? Didn't matter. My fellow deputies and I were expected to do two things. First, chalk it up to another one of those so-called utilitarian inconveniences for some greater good such as affirmative action. Second, piss in the cup.

That law enforcement agencies might continue this policy of obligating their employees to such embarrassments in an age when people are up in arms about the prospect of fielding inquiries into their citizenship strikes me as ironic. Cops are generously afforded an opportunity to exonerate themselves of implied charges by peeing in a cup?

When one considers the thousands of dollars that have literally been pissed away on this fiasco, one might reasonably ask what the hell our administrators have been smoking.

And if we should test them instead.

Comments (1)

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1

troglodad @ 7/9/2010 5:23 AM

I'm sorry, bu this smacks of the elitism shared by so many small department "good old boys". As law enforcement officers we are not above the law- we should in fact be held to a higher standard than civilians. We should lead by example and happily take our pee tests to proclaim to the public that we can be trusted.

While drug use by LEOs may be rare in your neck of the woods, it isn't so around the country. Especially with small departments that use nepotism to hire. There are far too many officers in the United States that should never have been hired in the first place- they bring shame and discredit to those of us that do our job and follow the rules. Case in point, in my region I recently read of a town officer not only was a user, but was selling drugs from a skating rink frequented by children. This officer even boasted to the C.I. about being a police officer and how it would help him sell his drugs.

Surely that officer's peers would rather have been taking pee tests regularly than have the embarrassment of one of their own being a drug dealer.

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

Recharging Your Batteries: The Benefits of "Unplugging"
There is certainly benefit to being current on events involving the people you consider...
Speaking on the Unspeakable: Ending the Pandemic of Police Officer Suicide
I've talked with officers who have lost a colleague to suicide—as well as many widows of...

Police Magazine