FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Mark Clark

Mark Clark

Mark Clark is the public information officer for a law enforcement agency in the southwest. He is also a photographer and contributor to POLICE Magazine.
Patrol

PC Collateral Damage

Political correctness has harmed the leadership in this country.

August 06, 2009  |  by - Also by this author

A retired CIA gentleman and I were recently commiserating about what we perceived as a lack of leadership in America.

While there is no shortage of anecdotes to illustrate the point, few are more telling or timely than the arrest of Professor Henry Gates at his house in Cambridge, Mass., incident to a suspicious person call.

Setting off a national debate on racial profiling, abuse of power, and the many permutations of civilian idiocy, the episode came to a head with President Obama's characterization of the arresting agency's actions as "stupid."

Officers across the color spectrum quickly registered their disfavor with Obama's ill-considered flippancy, and in a desperate bid for damage control our Commander in Chief hosted a Beer Summit at the White House.

Meeting at Potsdam, it wasn't.

Beer Summit

As a phalanx of photojournalists and frustrated lip readers monitored telephoto lenses, Obama, VP Joe Biden, Gates, and Sgt. James Crowley took seats about a small table on the White House lawn and ate some beer nuts, lifted a toast, smiled tightly, then called it a day.

Of the post-summit interviews, only Sgt. Crowley came off looking good in much the way Tom Selleck did after Rosie O'Donnell went psycho on his ass, too: Polished. Professional. A class act.

But outside of Gates' "I'll talk with your mama outside!" and Obama's "The Cambridge police acted stupidly," I couldn't help but note how many couched sentiments there were throughout this mess. No apologies tendered, no promises for greater compliance in the future, no appreciations for amnesties granted.

Meanwhile, others at the periphery who got sucked into the vortex not only did not make Obama's Docktoberfest, but are still dealing with aggravations because of the incident.

These include Lucia Whalen, the woman who called the Cambridge Police Department in the first place. Despite never mentioning race, she has been called a racist and received death threats.

They include Sgt. Leon Lashley, who, for defending his friend and colleague, has been defamed as an "Uncle Tom."

The two principals at the center of the controversy have joked about the possibility of going out to events together, but unless some entrepreneur puts them together on a speaking tour-which would no doubt be a money-maker-I doubt we'll be seeing the Crowley and Gates Comedy Hour anytime soon.

All of this makes me wonder why our president allowed himself to become embroiled in a matter that was categorically not of his concern in the first place.

It is undeniable that Obama has charisma-at least so long as that teleprompter's nearby. But is he a leader?

If this situation is to be viewed as any barometer, then prima facie evidence would suggest no.

Can one imagine the likes of Teddy Roosevelt, or Harry Truman, or Andrew Jackson insinuating himself into such a mess? Or, worse still, further compounding problems by hosting a beer summit and serving non-domestic brew?

Obama's "solution" smacks of the same mollifying efforts of so many nowadays. Some spoiled SOB acts the fool and then everyone's supposed to get together and play nice-nice. It is a practice popular with those who seek to placate certain minority segments, and provides the template for more of the same.

If Obama wanted to show some leadership on the matter, he would have familiarized himself with it as thoroughly as possible before deciding to comment on it. Then, should his friendship with Gates trump doing the right thing, he should have kept his mouth shut. Otherwise, he should have told Gates to grow a pair and apologize for his outburst.

As it was, Obama played the race card from the same deck that Gates had shuffled and failed to tender his own apology.

Shame on him.

Politically Correct Conditioning

Perhaps the root of the problem lies elsewhere. Maybe it's that we have been programmed not to address problems decisively. That whole template thing I mentioned.

If I'm onto something here-and I think I am-that template can be referred to as politically correct conditioning.

A little research shows that the term "politically correct" (P.C.) has been around since the first World War. In recent decades, it has become a collective catch-all for those attempts to insulate some people from harm by remediating others of their perceived deficiencies. Such efforts often entail sensitivity training, discipline, and termination of employment.

In trying to eradicate what has occasionally been hardwired into our DNA or acquired through one's training and experience, any pretense of surgical precision has largely been abandoned in favor of a butcher's finesse: You WILL stop on a dime and do an ideological one-eighty.

P.C.'s messengers are often loud, strident, and seemingly rampant in government. But wherever found and whoever its practitioner, there are commonalities throughout its employ.

P.C. dogma seeks to prevent any imaginable harm at the expense of candor and objectivity.

P.C. practitioners see no inconsistency in broadstroking one group while in ostensible support of another.

P.C. spin doctors discriminate between causes and groups as to what is politically fashionable to support. This accounts for why murderers like Mumia Abu-Jamal and Troy Davis get support from celebrities and special interest groups while justice for the fallen officers and their loved ones are perniciously ignored.

P.C. advocates seek to redistribute self worth at the expense of those who've earned it.

P.C. adherents deny others the opportunity for maturation through overcoming adversarial opinions.

Political correctness is often at cross-purposes with itself. It supports art like "Piss Christ" and Robert Mapplethorpe's work while expressing shock at a beefcake photo in the workplace.

As such, P.C. inhibits and destroys the advancement of character through the trial and error of genuine social intercourse. In its wake, we've seen literary deconstructionists, revisionist historians, and role reversals; been witness to the black-balled, the bitch-slapped, the suspended, the terminated, the exiled, and the emasculated. 

Redefining Bravery

It is hardly surprising that in an era where an honest expression of dissent is subject to opprobrium and its perpetrator given to reprisal that tendering a candid opinion can be deemed an act of courage.

Given the omnipresent litmus challenge of making inoffensive decisions, is it any wonder that less than 10 Medals of Honor have been awarded given the number of heroic lives lost during the course of our campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Regardless of one's stand on these conflicts, I would think that--outside of what-the-hell-are-we-doing-here-back-to-the-wall-bravery seen at Little Big Horn--America can recognize the bravery displayed by its own. Certainly, history's antagonists have accorded one another that much respect.

But then, closer to home, all we have to do is look at the number of officers who have been told that they were going to win their department's medal of valor only to find by the same person that the awards were to be rescinded for fear of alienating segments of the population that would align themselves with the fallen.

Political correctness is why many patrol officers have been inhibited from doing their jobs for fear of being accused of racism and profiling. How many lives of black youths lost during the epochal levels of the late '80s might have been saved by making more assertive contacts during that period of time? How many might be saved now, were it not for a cop whose investigative intuitions are kept in check for fear of finding himself under investigation and his promotion or transfer delayed?

None of these observations are particularly revelatory, but they are listed in black and white as concrete expressions of what many of us intuitively have come to recognize. More importantly, they point as to how a man such as Barack Obama could first ascend to the highest office in the country and then diminish its reputation thereafter.

Obama's own courtly overtures of political correctness to those who hate us are being read as weaknesses, emboldening others to encroach on America's interests. Nuclear subs in international waters, North Koreans successfully ransoming journalists, Iran capturing three American "spies"...

Much has been made of the educational opportunities afforded by the Gates incident. But if the incident teaches us anything, it is that there may be such a thing as an objective truth, and it's high time to acknowledge such. It also shows, once again for the umpteenth time ad infinitum, just how conditioned we have become to tolerating acts of idiocy, both by the initial perpetrator and by those that would support them.

If I've pissed you off, let me know.

Maybe we can discuss it over a beer.

Tags: Barack Obama, Henry Louis Gates Arrest, Cambridge PD


Comments (3)

Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

Morning Eagle @ 8/6/2009 8:37 PM

Excellent article. Once again D. Scoville has put in writing what many of us think and accomplished it in a clear, tactful manner. The whole P.C. thing has done, and will continue to do, great damage to the underlying fabric of our once great culture.

tppc38 @ 8/7/2009 8:52 AM

Thank you for your story. I do not label myself Oriental/European - American, rather, I pride myself in being an American, and for those who are irritated by my not using asian, tough, I don't drink beer.

mtarte @ 8/7/2009 11:56 AM

How very un-PC of you Dean to point out the idiocy of the "Beer Summit" and the detrimental effects political correctness has on this country. I'm retired now and teach criminal justice at a community college and am not PC in class. I don't think I'd last long, PC-wise, on the street these days. I truly feel sorry for young officers who have to not only deal with an even more violent society but somehow be PC enough to not offend anyone while doing it.

In many cases, students' get their first introduction to unvarnished truth in my classes. Many other instructors and professors are the same way here, but the majority are either fearful of repercussions or actually believe what they are doing. It is the latter that I fear the most. The ones that are the true believers in PC.

But I have hope for the future. Most of the students I talk to, in and out of class, recognize PC for what it is: a sham and to elevate those that want the prestige and rewards without the hard work and sacrifice necessary to obtain them.

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

What Went Wrong in Jersey City?
How did there become such a huge rift between the Jersey City police and the people that...
Warrior Tech's SafeCycle Chamber Verification Device
Warrior Tech, LLC took the chamber flag concept and improved upon it greatly. The...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine