FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Doug  Wyllie

Doug Wyllie

Doug Wyllie has authored more than 1,000 articles and tactical tips aimed at ensuring that police officers are safer and more successful on the streets. Doug is a Western Publishing Association “Maggie Award” winner for Best Regularly Featured Digital Edition Column. He is a member of International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA), an Associate Member of the California Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA), and a member of the Public Safety Writers Association (PSWA).
November 2018 (2)
October 2018 (4)
September 2018 (3)
August 2018 (6)
July 2018 (4)
June 2018 (3)
April 2018 (1)
March 2018 (2)
January 2018 (1)
September 2017 (1)
August 2017 (1)
May 2017 (1)
April 2017 (1)
January 2017 (1)
November 2016 (1)
September 2016 (1)
June 2016 (2)
May 2016 (3)
April 2016 (2)
March 2016 (1)
February 2016 (3)
January 2016 (1)
December 2015 (1)
November 2015 (5)
October 2015 (1)
September 2015 (3)
August 2015 (3)
July 2015 (6)
June 2015 (3)
May 2015 (2)
April 2015 (3)
March 2015 (5)
February 2015 (1)
January 2015 (1)
December 2014 (9)
October 2014 (2)
September 2014 (2)
August 2014 (2)
July 2014 (1)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (2)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (2)
February 2014 (3)
January 2014 (3)
December 2013 (2)
November 2013 (2)
October 2013 (3)
September 2013 (5)
August 2013 (3)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (4)
April 2013 (3)
March 2013 (5)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (3)
December 2012 (5)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (4)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (5)
July 2012 (4)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (6)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (3)
October 2011 (3)
September 2011 (3)
August 2011 (2)
July 2011 (2)
June 2011 (3)
May 2011 (4)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (5)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (3)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (4)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (5)
August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (4)
June 2010 (4)
May 2010 (4)
April 2010 (3)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (1)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (4)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (2)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (3)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (3)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (2)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (4)
February 2008 (5)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (4)
August 2007 (5)
July 2007 (4)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (5)

How to Give and Receive 'Assistance'

No matter your role in the backup equation, it is a damned important one.

July 23, 2009  |  by - Also by this author

When I started working patrol, I found it curious that the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department's "backup" request, which meant non-emergent  need for another officer to respond, equated to the California Highway Patrol's "assistance" request. I was also perplexed at how CHP's "backup" request, which meant emergent need for an officer on scene, was the equivalent of our "assistance" request. According to my friend John, this is still the case, with deputies obligated to ask dispatchers for clarification: "Are they asking for our kind of ‘assistance’? Or theirs?"

A simple matter of terminology? Perhaps. But I wonder how it sometimes plays out, what with officers or deputies from other agencies monitoring CHP radio traffic and deciding whether or not to roll on a call because they thought it was non-emergent when it was. After all these decades, you’d think that someone would have gotten around to straightening things out.

To be sure, there is a difference between an emergent need for help and wanting another officer on-scene in the hopes of preventing an emergent situation. But given the inverse correlation between available time to communicate and any emergent need for it, cops don't always know what they're rolling into. And the harder they’re rolling, the greater the confusion and uncertainty.

I've discussed some no-brainer aspects of backup in an earlier blog but here I want to talk about communication and its role in preventing backup from becoming a liability.

Whenever a cop sees that another cop has stopped by to help out, whatever the reason, the officer receiving backup should let the arriving officer know what’s going on as soon as possible. It may be as simple a matter as motioning "code 4" with his or her hands.

Despite this, I've seen cops fail to acknowledge the backup of other cops—and not because they were too committed to some matter of officer safety. Whether it was an interagency rivalry, a matter of personality, or the arrogance of the officer initiating the stop, they just ignored the arriving officer. It was as though they were saying "I don't need your help and to show you just how much I don’t need it, I'm going to show how insignificant you are to me."

Aside from being rude, it encourages a certain apathy from the backup officer and discourages him or her from wanting to help the primary cop in the future.

Now I know there may be some people you may not want as backup. If that’s the case, give them a "four" and send them on their way.

We've all worked with them, be they screw-ups or assholes. Of one sergeant, deputies routinely joked that if he ever requested assistance, he'd be lucky if they suited up a trustee to roll. My sympathies were largely on the side of those who said, "I may piss on his grave, but I ain't gonna help him get there."

My belabored point is that if you find yourself receiving backup—whether it’s requested or not—make a point of letting your backup officer know what’s going on.

And if you do intend to take advantage of his assistance, then give him clear-cut directions. Don't assume that he’s going to do something that you would normally do. If you say, "Take care of them," are you saying search and detain? Handcuff and secure? Just keep a watchful eye?

Make sure you've done everything you can to identify your players before you separate them from one another, leaving one cop to deal with the detained passengers, while you search the vehicle.

One of my training officers started to search a car one night so that all I could see of him was his feet dangling out the passenger side door as he snooped beneath the seat. Looking at the ID of one of the detainees, I happened to read the man’s name aloud. Upon hearing the name, my t.o. hurriedly got out. He then explained to me that the man had previously wrestled a deputy’s gun away from him.

In backup situations, finding out as much as you possibly can about the players includes understanding who you're relying on for information. Nowhere is this more of a concern than when you have to rely on officers you've never worked with before.

In researching an upcoming feature story on children of fallen heroes, I learned of a Texas law enforcement officer who got information on the whereabouts of an outstanding warrant suspect. Unfortunately, the officer’s regular partner wasn't available so he ended up taking a rookie that he really didn't know much about. The two officers had been allowed inside the suspect's home by a relative when the suspect suddenly jumped from a position of cover and fired. The officer ended up getting shot—first by the suspect, then twice in the back by his panicked and inexperienced partner. He was dead before his body hit the floor.

Such are the cautionary parables that serve to remind us why officers need to communicate with one another even well ahead of time. It might just make you think twice about entering a situation where you might be better going in alone—and whether you’d really want to do that in the first place.

Make sure that you're both on the same page throughout the stop. If you intend to seat the driver in the back seat, have the other officer stand by while you do it. If you’re going to search the car, let your partner know so that she doesn’t assume you’re helping him keep a vigil on the involved players.

If for any reason you feel it is unsafe to run subjects over the MDT, do it over your portable radio. Make sure your car radio is on a different frequency than the one receiving returns on your subject.

If you copy a return or find something in the car that is going to result in the arrest of an occupant, don't wait to let the backup officer know. The person in jeopardy of being arrested knows it, and the longer you delay in passing on the word and getting him safely into custody, the more time he has to embolden himself and execute a game plan that’s contrary to yours, be it to escape or go on the offensive.

If you are the backup officer, then take your responsibility seriously. Most of the time, you will be the one keeping an eye on detainees. Watch what they’re doing, while being vigilant for any approaching threats. Don’t be fixated on what the primary officer is doing.

It helps to know how you and other cops—especially cops from other agencies—will work together ahead of time. So get together with your neighboring agencies' cops. Invite them for a cup and discuss what's on each other's radar and how they handle things. Formulate backup game plans ahead of time. Let them know what you expect. Find out what they want.

By getting backup ahead of time, you may avoid requesting "assistance" later (or vice versa if you're CHP).

Comments (2)

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Dayhead @ 7/25/2009 1:36 PM

In my area (Houston, Texas) all agencies EXCEPT DPS speak plain english. No rediculous 10 this or 11 that codes. It saves time and in a fast and easy.

sdickson @ 10/2/2009 4:37 AM

Great points! The comment about plain english does not work. My agency uses ten codes and plain english when on channels with outside agencies. What is plain to me and the officers on my agency may not be to you and other outside agencies. Such as the article points out, "assitance" request, is it emergent or not?

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

Speaking on the Unspeakable: Ending the Pandemic of Police Officer Suicide
I've talked with officers who have lost a colleague to suicide—as well as many widows of...
Love and Hate: Some Observations about the Pittsburgh Synagogue Attack
It's somewhat disappointing that it takes an act of evil for the pure good in people to...

Police Magazine