FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Doug  Wyllie

Doug Wyllie

Doug Wyllie has authored more than 1,000 articles and tactical tips aimed at ensuring that police officers are safer and more successful on the streets. Doug is a Western Publishing Association “Maggie Award” winner for Best Regularly Featured Digital Edition Column. He is a member of International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA), an Associate Member of the California Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA), and a member of the Public Safety Writers Association (PSWA).
November 2018 (2)
October 2018 (4)
September 2018 (3)
August 2018 (6)
July 2018 (4)
June 2018 (3)
April 2018 (1)
March 2018 (2)
January 2018 (1)
September 2017 (1)
August 2017 (1)
May 2017 (1)
April 2017 (1)
January 2017 (1)
November 2016 (1)
September 2016 (1)
June 2016 (2)
May 2016 (3)
April 2016 (2)
March 2016 (1)
February 2016 (3)
January 2016 (1)
December 2015 (1)
November 2015 (5)
October 2015 (1)
September 2015 (3)
August 2015 (3)
July 2015 (6)
June 2015 (3)
May 2015 (2)
April 2015 (3)
March 2015 (5)
February 2015 (1)
January 2015 (1)
December 2014 (9)
October 2014 (2)
September 2014 (2)
August 2014 (2)
July 2014 (1)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (2)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (2)
February 2014 (3)
January 2014 (3)
December 2013 (2)
November 2013 (2)
October 2013 (3)
September 2013 (5)
August 2013 (3)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (4)
April 2013 (3)
March 2013 (5)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (3)
December 2012 (5)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (4)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (5)
July 2012 (4)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (6)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (3)
October 2011 (3)
September 2011 (3)
August 2011 (2)
July 2011 (2)
June 2011 (3)
May 2011 (4)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (5)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (3)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (4)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (5)
August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (4)
June 2010 (4)
May 2010 (4)
April 2010 (3)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (1)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (4)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (2)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (3)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (3)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (2)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (4)
February 2008 (5)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (4)
August 2007 (5)
July 2007 (4)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (5)

The Challenge of Analyzing a Tragedy While We’re Still Grieving

May 28, 2009  |  by - Also by this author

Shortly after the murders of four Oakland officers by parolee Lovelle Mixon in March, I got a call from Police Magazine editor David Griffith. He wanted me to write a feature article on the Oakland incidents.

To be honest I didn’t want to do it.

I knew that researching the Oakland shooting would be a difficult and unpleasant assignment. Not only was I half a state removed from the crime scene, but I knew from the get-go that getting those close to the investigation to go on the record would prove damned difficult. Not that I didn’t understand why: If I was under a gag order, I’d keep my mouth shut, too.

Meanwhile, others not shy about articulating their concerns given their understanding of the incident can sometimes do so in very assertive terms. And I knew that their comments had the potential to anger the men and women of the Oakland Police Department who served with the murdered officers.

So in writing the article, I had to find my own answers to two questions: How does one encourage reflection and discussion on a tragedy of such magnitude in the absence of incontrovertible facts? And will those facts ever be truly ascertained when most of the principals are dead?

Perhaps the question should be one of whether or not a discussion should even take place so soon in the aftermath of such a tragedy before the release of the official report. For in doing so, we are almost obligated to go out on a limb and ask uncomfortable questions and make unpopular speculations. After all, Monday morning quarterbacking is easy. Being an active participant in the trenches is hard.

So I still wrestled with the question: Was I doing the right thing. Then as I worked on the Oakland article, another mass killing of officers occurred when three of Pittsburgh's finest were shot and killed. Again it was incident to two separate engagements by a lone suspect who—like Oakland’s Mixon—took the first two officers by surprise.

The Pittsburgh incident solidified my determination to go forward with my Oakland article, which was published in our May issue under the title “What Can Be Learned from the Oakland Tragedy.”

Because whether or not one agrees with our take—indeed, whether or not our take is 100-percent accurate given the limitations of what was communicated to us—some of the suggestions and considerations articulated from the experts that we contacted could save the lives of law enforcement officers.

There is precedent for law enforcement tragedies spurring changes in procedure and policy to keep officers safer. Case in point, the Newhall, Calif., incident in 1970.

The California Highway Patrol shootout in Newhall is generally cited as spurring a paradigm shift in the tactical training of patrol officers. And I like to believe that even if Oakland and Pittsburgh are not catalysts for change at a national level then at least some local practices will likely change in their aftermaths. Hopefully sooner than later.

There are some 12,000 officers’ names on the National Law Enforcement Memorial. Our highest mission at Police Magazine is to keep as many names as possible from being added to those walls. One way of doing that is by examining how the names of others got there. That’s what we tried to do with our May feature article on the Oakland Tragedy.

It is our sincerest wish that this article will serve as a jumping-off point for discussions of patrol and SWAT tactics and perhaps serve some minor role in preventing future police massacres.

Comments (2)

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

spartancops @ 5/31/2009 12:50 PM

I can totally understand why you were reluctant to write articles discussng the Oakland incident. Anytime an incident is debriefed you risk the emotions of those involved who were just doing the best with what they had. But if we don't we will fail to learn the lessons taught and will be doomed to repeat them again.

Officers all over the country are asking the question, why? They are primed to receive information about this incident and change their behavior and habits. As time goes by their urgency and motivation fades.

This is a difficult process and a difficult balance. On one hand it is hard to get objective answers from the officers involved when they are still working through the incident themselves. Pushing for immediate answers provides shallow ones that may not be correct or sufficient. But digging deep so fast hurts those who have already suffered enough.

On the other hand, the lessons must be learned as soon as possible to strike while the iron is hot and officers are listening. When finally released official debriefs are often so distant from the time period when they happened that they have little effect on those they are intended to help.

Your articles on the Oakland incident are the best I have seen so far and I think they do a good job balancing the issues involved. Thanks for researching them and writing them.

Scott @

David Moore S-55 @ 5/31/2009 7:24 PM

This one pain cuts deep...never forget to say "Thank You" to those who stand between the wolves and society...During releases have to look at records that got them in the big house in the first place what they have done since being placed in confinement and most importantly Parole follow-up and support! God Bless the families and Oakland PD and citizens who turned out for this dark day - their spirit lives on in those who follow -You made a difference!

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

Speaking on the Unspeakable: Ending the Pandemic of Police Officer Suicide
I've talked with officers who have lost a colleague to suicide—as well as many widows of...
Love and Hate: Some Observations about the Pittsburgh Synagogue Attack
It's somewhat disappointing that it takes an act of evil for the pure good in people to...

Police Magazine