FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Doug  Wyllie

Doug Wyllie

Doug Wyllie has authored more than 1,000 articles and tactical tips aimed at ensuring that police officers are safer and more successful on the streets. Doug is a Western Publishing Association “Maggie Award” winner for Best Regularly Featured Digital Edition Column. He is a member of International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA), an Associate Member of the California Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA), and a member of the Public Safety Writers Association (PSWA).
October 2018 (3)
September 2018 (3)
August 2018 (6)
July 2018 (4)
June 2018 (3)
April 2018 (1)
March 2018 (2)
January 2018 (1)
September 2017 (1)
August 2017 (1)
May 2017 (1)
April 2017 (1)
January 2017 (1)
November 2016 (1)
September 2016 (1)
June 2016 (2)
May 2016 (3)
April 2016 (2)
March 2016 (1)
February 2016 (3)
January 2016 (1)
December 2015 (1)
November 2015 (5)
October 2015 (1)
September 2015 (3)
August 2015 (3)
July 2015 (6)
June 2015 (3)
May 2015 (2)
April 2015 (3)
March 2015 (5)
February 2015 (1)
January 2015 (1)
December 2014 (9)
October 2014 (2)
September 2014 (2)
August 2014 (2)
July 2014 (1)
June 2014 (2)
May 2014 (2)
April 2014 (4)
March 2014 (2)
February 2014 (3)
January 2014 (3)
December 2013 (2)
November 2013 (2)
October 2013 (3)
September 2013 (5)
August 2013 (3)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (4)
April 2013 (3)
March 2013 (5)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (3)
December 2012 (5)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (4)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (5)
July 2012 (4)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (6)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (5)
December 2011 (5)
November 2011 (3)
October 2011 (3)
September 2011 (3)
August 2011 (2)
July 2011 (2)
June 2011 (3)
May 2011 (4)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (5)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (3)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (4)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (5)
August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (4)
June 2010 (4)
May 2010 (4)
April 2010 (3)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (1)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (4)
November 2009 (4)
October 2009 (2)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (3)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (3)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (2)
July 2008 (3)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (4)
February 2008 (5)
January 2008 (3)
December 2007 (2)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (4)
August 2007 (5)
July 2007 (4)
June 2007 (4)
May 2007 (5)

Responding to Off-Duty Incidents

As Clint said, you’ve got to know your limitations.

May 09, 2007  |  by - Also by this author

How often do we find ourselves faced with an off-duty situation that would normally require our direct and immediate intervention if we were functioning in an on-duty capacity? Hopefully, not very often.

But should we find ourselves in such a position, the extent to which we have planned for it ahead of time can optimize our chances for coming out ahead. 

Taking something of a Hippocratic oath--first, do no harm--can help. By not playing into another's hands and needlessly escalating a situation, we minimize both our obligation to take action and any inherent liability if we do.

As law enforcement’s patron saint of off-duty escapades put it, “A man’s got to know his limitations.”

When it comes to the prospect of taking off-duty action, our limitations are:

• Lack of recognizable identification. How will citizens and on-duty officers know the legitimacy of your actions?

• Minimal tactical resources. You’re probably going to lack a ballistic vest, radio communication, backup weapons, radio car, or much in the way of use-of-force options.

• Liability. Will your department back your play when it comes to sanctioning your involvement? Will it cover any possible medical expenditures you incur incident to your actions?

While many state laws give law enforcement officers authority to act as peace officers anywhere within their state, the duty to exercise that authority while off-duty is usually defined by agency policy. That definition can include limiting an officer’s justifiable actions to those situations wherein there is immediate danger to person or property or of the escape of the perpetrator.

Therefore, unless you’ve observed the commission of a crime involving immediate danger to person or property or you have received prior approval from local authorities, you should not take any action in the capacity of a peace officer.

Notifying the police agency having jurisdiction is the best option, particularly as most officers have the luxury of cell phones to do so.

Finding yourself involved in an action outside policy can result in you defending yourself in a civil action without benefit of your department’s legal counsel.

Unfortunately, you can find yourself involved in off-duty incidents despite having no desire to do so. Statistics show that a number of off-duty incidents can be attributed to deputies and officers who put themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time. An example of this might be a late night withdrawal at an ATM. Other off-duty incidents might be precipitated by impaired judgment due to alcohol intoxication.

Officers should consider the possibility of being present when a crime takes place, and not only minimize their need to become involved, but the likelihood of becoming a collateral casualty. Carrying a second wallet or set of car keys (cuff keys can be dead giveaways, literally) are good ideas.

And as proud as you are of being a cop, think about when and where to wear law enforcement t-shirts, hats, and other logo wear. Post-incident interviews with aggravated assault suspects bear out that many consciously picked out their victims by their choice of such attire.

Above all, sit down and talk with your family members. Have a game plan in place in anticipation of any possible off-duty incidents. Make sure they know what to do.

Once uniformed officers are on the scene of an incident wherein the presence of an off-duty officer has become known, the senior or lead officer needs to take control of the situation. He or she needs to issue commands so as to minimize the likelihood of friendly fire, first by establishing containment of any known suspects, then by displacing the off-duty officer to a location where he is neither a threat to uniformed personnel nor subject to friendly fire. It is imperative that one officer issue commands so that there is no conflicting information and everyone is apprised of the circumstances.

Even when the most conscientious officers are involved, off-duty incidents can and have resulted in tragic consequences.

A 2006 practical app study on off-duty/plainclothes incidents conducted by the Wauconda Police Department determined that officers easily understood how off-duty cops could be shot. Keep in mind that, although most of our time is spent off-duty, the majority of our training is focused on surviving on-duty incidents.

Sometimes your best option when you witness an off-duty incident is to be a good witness.

Comments (3)

Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

jpb1972 @ 6/2/2007 7:45 AM

Very good topic, there can never be enough discussion about this type of incident. As the article states, we are not trained in off duty scenerios ,as most of our training refers to being on duty.
As far as being id'd as an off duty officer on scene, how many of us carry off duty ,and when we do are we carrying a badge on our belt ,holster side.
Any comments on this?

LHellinga @ 6/20/2007 3:46 PM

Very good article. I carry most of the time when off-duty, and always have my badge and a cell phone, on my weak side, so I can hold my gun and retrieve my ID and phone. If I don't have my weapon, I don't have my badge. Also my wife is very clear on if she needs to call 9-1-1, to advise them I'm an officer in plain clothes.

brentsims @ 3/2/2009 6:26 PM

I have seen this very thing with new officers. Alot of them, being proud of their new profession, will wear cop t-shirts and hats. In my opinion which is worth 50 cents and a cup of coffee, its just a really bad practice. You're really setting yourself out there. My way of thinking is when I am off duty, I really dont want to advertise who I am and what I do. How many criminals do we see wearing a t-shirt that says, I'm a Drug Dealer ! or I Rob Banks!

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

Training School Teachers and Administrators to Respond to Active Killers
Very few people who get into teaching have the mental, emotional, or physical fortitude to...
IACP 2018: Watching Trump's Speech to Law Enforcement
Trump slammed the Obama administration for restricting law enforcement's acquisition of...
How Police Agencies Can Help Prevent K-9 Duty Deaths
A police K-9 is not just a member of the department—they are also a family member of the...

Police Magazine