FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Subscribe to This Thread

Former California Officer Convicted of Assault

6/27/2008 12:48 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 511

Former California Officer Convicted of Assault



June 19th, 2008

A former Maywood police officer was convicted Wednesday of assaulting a handcuffed suspect and filing a false police report about the incident afterward.

Prosecutors argued in a seven-day jury trial that Michael Joseph Singleton rammed the prisoner's head against a wall in retaliation for a stream of insults and behavior that included spitting at the officer.

The victim, Jose Bernal, now 35, was knocked unconscious, his nose was broken and he suffered temporary paralysis to one side of his face.

The conviction is a significant victory for the Los Angeles County district attorney's office, which has struggled to win convictions in cases involving police brutality. A jury deadlocked earlier this year in favor of acquitting Singleton, with nine jurors voting not guilty.

Police misconduct trials present a challenge to prosecutors because testimony of on-duty officers is pitted against the accounts of victims who more often than not have criminal records, experts say.

Deputy Dist. Atty. Margo Baxter, who prosecuted the case both times, called Singleton's conduct "a huge betrayal of the public trust; it deserves a punishment."

At trial, a trainee working with Singleton that night in May 2004 testified against the veteran officer, saying excessive force was used and was covered up in the report. A surveillance camera captured a small part of the incident, which prosecutors argued contradicted Singleton's account.

Michael P. Stone, Singleton's attorney, argued that both men lost their balance and fell against a wall, causing Bernal's injuries. He said Joseph Densmore, the trainee, had a tainted perspective because his own promotion was at stake.

Stone said he was surprised that the jury returned such a quick verdict after being handed the case late Tuesday, adding that jurors had appeared to be mistrusting of law enforcement officers.

"Jury's acceptance of police testimony is far less apparent than it used to be," Stone said.

In a federal civil suit, Densmore alleged that he was fired for reporting the abuse. The suit was dismissed and Densmore has appealed.

Maywood police conducted an internal investigation but did not deliver the case to the district attorney's office for almost three years, until the statute of limitations had nearly expired, Baxter said.

In this month's retrial, Baxter called to the stand the officer who was in charge of the internal investigation, as well as medical experts.

Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley said his office was committed to prosecuting officers who break the law.

"This conduct is the kind that people in law enforcement despise and resent because it hurts the overall integrity of the profession and denigrates the heroic work that goes on every day," Cooley said.

Singleton, 43, is scheduled to be sentenced Aug. 11. He faces a maximum sentence of three years and eight months.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


REPLY 1  -  1  of  1
7/1/2008 7:07 AM #1
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1

RE: Former California Officer Convicted of Assault


Maywood did not deliver the case perhaps because NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED by Officer Singleton. Hurts the overall integrity? Before posting this news article, or any news article against your brothers and sisters in blue, perhaps you should take the time to see the evidence. Do you know the accused? Did you sit in on the trials in support of your brother? Integrity?

Did you know the first jury favored acquittal 9-3? Did you know that if it were "Joe-Blow" citizen the case never would have even gone in front of another jury? 9-3 hung jury is a landslide WIN in the world of law. But the DA was on a mission. A mission to win at all costs -- even though this use of force was justified...and documented.

Did you know the trainee did not help his partner with this 300 pound prisoner one bit? Had he assised even a little bit, perhaps they wouldn't have fallen into the wall. Did you know this trainee ended up losing his job? Did you know the trainee never said a word referencing "excessive force" until Officer Singleton voiced concerns about this trainee's inabilities as as an officer?

Do you know Officer Singleton? If you did, you would clearly know he is not capable of that which he is now convicted of and certainly does not deserve to be punished for his years of public service.

The SCIENCE supports Mr. Singleton's innocence; biomechnical experts who testified that the prisoners injuries could NOT have occurred the way the trainee said they did, but rather how Officer Singleton said they did. While attempting to gain control of a prisioner, they fell forward into a wall. The scientific evidence supports this folks. The video snippets support this.

Did you know that if you are a police officer, finding an impartial jury is next to impossible? Most potential jurors believe if a cop is accused, they MUST be guilty. Did YOU sit in on the trial supporting a fellow officer? Or did you take the position, "if he was charged he must be guilty?" If you did, shame on you brothers and sisters in blue.

As police officers, every single one of you know how inaccurate newspaper reports are and how slanted they can be. Next time you arrest a convicted felon with a history of stabbing and punching family relatives and punching his wife, not to mention a history of resisting arrest, perhaps you should just put your hands in your pockets or risk getting accused of excessive force and face jail time yourself. Guess you'd just have to stand there while they tried to bite you, head butt you, pull away from you, and allow them to spit at you.

Now that you have a few of the facts -- facts supported by evidence -- perhaps you might take some time to support your fellow officer. Motion for New Trial pending. Hope to see you there.

Police Magazine