FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Subscribe to This Thread

April 2009: Falls Church, Virginia

4/7/2009 2:04 PM
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 85

April 2009: Falls Church, Virginia


Put yourself in the shoes of Falls Church, Va., officer Alan Freed. You are patrolling with a trainee and confront a man painting a car with cans of spray paint. Now ask yourself the following questions:

Officer Freed regrets having assumed that Price was a local and, given his age, not a threat. Have you ever found yourself making assumptions that could have gotten you in trouble? What do you do to keep your inferences in check?

Have you thought how you would respond to being shot? Do you believe that you might pause in the middle of a firefight to check your injuries? Have you mentally pre-conditioned yourself against it?

While Freed was happy with the performance of his SIG Sauer duty pistol, he was not pleased with his ammo or the stopping power of the 9mm. His department has gone to a larger caliber gun with better loads. How secure do you feel in your department's choice of ammunition? Do you feel that your agency's choice of ammo and caliber was made more in deference to potential liability than officer safety?


REPLY 1  -  10  of  14
5/9/2009 8:29 PM #1
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 379

RE: April 2009: Falls Church, Virginia


I think every officer makes these same type of assumptions on threats all the time. Unfortunately, sometimes we are wrong and it bites us but we would be less than human if we did not make these assumptions.

I am a firm believer in visualization. I have prepared myself for being shot and I always visualize that I keep fighting. I recognize that there is no way of telling for sure until this actually happens, but I think I will continue to fight and will check the injuries after the scene is secure. This is how I plan it in training, how I visualize it, and how I hope I react in a real fight.

I do have one advantage in my personal weapon. My agency allows us to carry any weapon we desire between 380 and 45 caliber. We use Speer Gold Dot LE ammunition based on its tested performance. There are some rumors of changing to a single weapon and ammo, but I don't know if it will happen or not. This is being done for logistics reasons and not liability. It is easier to train and store ammo and parts for one pistol than multiple different ones.

5/11/2009 10:15 PM #2
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 213

RE: April 2009: Falls Church, Virginia


I try to approach every person as if he's the most dire threat I've ever approached while acting as if he is a saint. That way if he IS dangerous I'm already mentally prepared to take him down, and if he isn't I don't get a complaint for 'being rude' to him. Operative word here is 'TRY', unfortunately. Sometimes complacency rears it's ugly head no matter what you try to do.

During a fight I'm concentrating on taking the other guy down, not on my own injuries. I've suffered several injuries over the years which I wasn't even aware of until well after the fight when someone else pointed out I was bleeding. I think the worst time to worry about an injury would be in the middle of the fight. Oh sure, maybe you got a tourniquet on your shot leg in time...only to get a bullet in the back of the head because you gave the suspect time to reload, have a cup of coffee, and walk up on you. Neutralize the threat, THEN worry about injuries.

5/14/2009 4:07 AM #3
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 216

Not so nice...


If I get shot...the sorry SOB will regret ever doing it. I get extremely pissed off when injured, in particular when trying to get something done.

Some one will die, and I might die too. It's called "COMBAT" if someone starts shooting at an officer. My training will kick in and so help the bastard that makes the mistake of engaging me.

I'll wrap up injuries later. I will have too much fun exterminating the threat first.

"Is your number still 911?" - Ofc. Rachel T.

5/14/2009 4:12 AM #4
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 216

Public Announcement


Quote:
Original post by Melanie

Put yourself in the shoes of Falls Church, Va., officer Alan Freed. You are patrolling with a trainee and confront a man painting a car with cans of spray paint. Now ask yourself the following questions:

Officer Freed regrets having assumed that Price was a local and, given his age, not a threat. Have you ever found yourself making assumptions that could have gotten you in trouble? What do you do to keep your inferences in check?

Have you thought how you would respond to being shot? Do you believe that you might pause in the middle of a firefight to check your injuries? Have you mentally pre-conditioned yourself against it?

While Freed was happy with the performance of his SIG Sauer duty pistol, he was not pleased with his ammo or the stopping power of the 9mm. His department has gone to a larger caliber gun with better loads. How secure do you feel in your department's choice of ammunition? Do you feel that your agency's choice of ammo and caliber was made more in deference to potential liability than officer safety?

ALL DEPARTMENTS SHOULD GO TO A .45 Cal WEAPON. LAW ENFORCEMENT DEALS WITH THE UNKOWN JUST LIKE A SOLDIER. GIVE YOUR OFFICERS THE STOPPING POWER NEEDED TO END THE FIGHT FAST AND EFFECTIVELY. SWAT/SRT's CAN'T BE EVERY WHERE ALL THE TIME.

REMEMBER THE L.A. BANK ROBBERY.

"Is your number still 911?" - Ofc. Rachel T.

5/14/2009 8:38 PM #5
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 379

RE: April 2009: Falls Church, Virginia


Rach,

Don't fall for the caliber arguments. Shot placement is really what counts. In the North Hollywood robbery, one accurate shot (per robber) to the medulla box would have ended the threat (yeah, it is almost an impossible shot for a pistol in that type of gunfight).

There are lots of documented cases of 45's failing to stop (even .44 magnums have failed). And there are lots of documented cases of people dying from a single hit with a .22LR.

The other fact that really counts is the mindset. In the Miami shootout (1986 FBI v bank robbers), this was proven almost beyond a doubt. One robber had a fatal wound from the first hit (cut the brachial artery). He had no quit in him and lived long enough to fight, fire over 200 rounds (including reloading several times), use tactics, kill 2 agents, and wound several more. The other bad guy had an easily survivable hit and was basically out of the fight, yelling to his partner that he had been hit.

And one agent, hit in the hand, managed to keep his presence of mind, switch to his long gun, figure out how to keep a pump shotgun in action with just one hand - in the middle of the gunfight mind you, and find a way to end the fight after getting shooting the 12 gauge dry and getting another handgun.

The mind of the guy who does not want to give up will keep you in action. The mind of the guy who is not ready will shut him down. Other than a very few shots that are very hard (like the medulla box), almost all hits will let the fight continue. Those few will end the fight no matter what.


EDITED TO ADD:  

Oh yeah, after saying all that, I still like the 45 and its platform. Give me a 1911 pistol and I am happy. Of course, the next pistol I am buying is a used .357 magnum Model 19 revolver, so I am old fashioned in my weapon tastes. I know these designs work and work well.

Last edited @ 5/14/2009 8:40 PM

5/15/2009 8:59 PM #6
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 216

Size matters?


Quote:
Original post by Steve Rothstein

Rach,

Don't fall for the caliber arguments. Shot placement is really what counts. In the North Hollywood robbery, one accurate shot (per robber) to the medulla box would have ended the threat (yeah, it is almost an impossible shot for a pistol in that type of gunfight).

There are lots of documented cases of 45's failing to stop (even .44 magnums have failed). And there are lots of documented cases of people dying from a single hit with a .22LR.

The other fact that really counts is the mindset. In the Miami shootout (1986 FBI v bank robbers), this was proven almost beyond a doubt. One robber had a fatal wound from the first hit (cut the brachial artery). He had no quit in him and lived long enough to fight, fire over 200 rounds (including reloading several times), use tactics, kill 2 agents, and wound several more. The other bad guy had an easily survivable hit and was basically out of the fight, yelling to his partner that he had been hit.

And one agent, hit in the hand, managed to keep his presence of mind, switch to his long gun, figure out how to keep a pump shotgun in action with just one hand - in the middle of the gunfight mind you, and find a way to end the fight after getting shooting the 12 gauge dry and getting another handgun.

The mind of the guy who does not want to give up will keep you in action. The mind of the guy who is not ready will shut him down. Other than a very few shots that are very hard (like the medulla box), almost all hits will let the fight continue. Those few will end the fight no matter what.


EDITED TO ADD:

Oh yeah, after saying all that, I still like the 45 and its platform. Give me a 1911 pistol and I am happy. Of course, the next pistol I am buying is a used .357 magnum Model 19 revolver, so I am old fashioned in my weapon tastes. I know these designs work and work well.

1986? No I don't remember the FBI agents v. nasty bank robbers...I was like 11 years old or something like that...LOL. Still playing with Barbies and G.I. Joes

You are totally right that shot placement is everything. I'm just a girl that likes big weapons...that's all. :-) The bigger the more fun!

Used .357 huh? Cool. Those things are so much fun.

"Is your number still 911?" - Ofc. Rachel T.

5/16/2009 5:26 PM #7
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 379

RE: April 2009: Falls Church, Virginia


Yeah, the .357 is fun. My agency has three we are getting rid of. We kept them for use in training as simunitions guns, but we finally bought new pistols to rpelace them. I get to buy one for 60% of what it cost the state originally. To give you an idea of the rise in prices, we bought them in 1984 and I think it will cost me about $117.

Unfortunately, I was not playing with toys (well, not kid's toys) in 1986. There were a string of bank robberies int eh Miami area in 1986. The suspects were very bloodthirsty, shooting people who had complied with their orders, apparently just for the hell of it. They were also suspects in a few other killings out in the woods around the city. It turns out the two suspects were also former soldiers and military police.

One afternoon, the FBI surveillance paid off and they found the two suspects driving around. When the FBI tried to stop them, a shootout ensued. During the shootout, two agents were killed and 5 more were wounded (if I remember the numbers correctly). Both suspects were also killed.

As I pointed out, the main lesson I took from the shootout was the mindset of the people involved. The lesson the FBI took from the shootout was that they needed better weapons. The first shot fired by the FBI, the one that would have killed the bad guy eventually, went through the arm and into the chest. If it had more power, it could have penetrated the lungs and heart (in theory).

So, the FBI started better testing of ammunition (which does help us) and looking for a replacement for the 9mm. They ended up choosing the 10mm round, which is a real powerhouse round. It was so powerful in normal loadings, that some agents could not control it. The FBI developed a reduced power loading that was controllable. Someone else realized that if they reduced the loading, the cartridge itself could be made smaller. The smaller cartridge also allowed for smaller guns. Thus, we now have the .40 S&W round. This round fits into 9mm frames and gives people with a smaller hand the easier pistol to grip.

Of course, all of this history lesson is from my memory, and I am old enough that it could be faulty. I could also have some of the details wrong.

But there are several other incidents you can research on combat. Just for police, there are so many famous incidents that date back to the 60's and early 70's that we still base our training on.

The Newhall shooting in California in 1970 was one of the first we study for tactics and how things work. There are a bunch more after that. We redid a lot of our tactics after Columbine, and we are reworking more after the North Hollywood shootout.

We also looked at the incidents for other things. A great book, if you can find it, is "Officer Down - Code Three". It is now out of print, but was an LAPD detective's (Pierce R. Brooks) examination of a couple hundred police line of duty deaths. He came up with the ten deadly errors that we make that result in police deaths. I wish this were still in print because I still use it as the basis for classes (Joseph Petrocelli wrote an article a few years ago asking why we still make these same mistakes).

Another case you should look at is the Constable Lunsford killing. He was a Northeast Texas constable working drug interdiction on the highway. It was one of the first (if not the first) death of an officer caught on a dashboard videocam recording. Looking at it from the comfort of classroom, we can see several mistakes he made, such as not understanding or catching some of the warning signs that he was about to be attacked. The video used to be on youtube, but I haven't looked if it still is.

5/17/2009 10:12 PM #8
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 213

RE: April 2009: Falls Church, Virginia


Another writer you can read if you want to learn more about Police shootings is Massad Ayoob. He's a cop who's written several books on Police shootings and other lethal force encounters. He goes into the Miami FBI shootout in detail in 'The Ayoob Files', an anthology of his reports published in American Handgunner magazine. Anyways, that one shootout was the predicate for a change in training throughout the Law Enforcement community.

Here's a link to the FBI shootout.
http://www.miamibeach411.com/news/index.php?/news/comments/miami-shootout/

5/19/2009 4:10 AM #9
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 216

Steve and Wolfva


I can't believe a .357 was that much back then! :-) Wow... Yeah, my instructor let me shoot his .357 revolver. It was bad as hell...LOL. I loved it. My hair would whoosh back when I fired it because of the discharge being powerful...LOL.

So that's how all that came about (FBI and bank robbers). You know that reminds me of the AK-47 gang that the Detroit FBI just got done dealing with. These guys were robbing banks using AK-47's and were extremely efficient in what they were doing. In and out in seconds... I think some were ex-soldiers (don't quote me - I'm tired, just got off duty). But that's the thing...unfortunately soldiers go bad and so do cops. We have to be prepared to deal with people that have had the same type training as we do. They will also have a combat mindset. They did teach us in our Reserve Training about the 10 deadly sins. That I really appreciated being made aware of that, and I appreciate the guy who came up with it even more. (and thanks for the link wolfva).

It's definitely something that all officers should keep in the back of their mind is when you strap on your flack jacket before every shift...remember why you put that thing on. Stay alert...a boring night could turn into a combat zone. Especially in this economy. I am seeing it more and more. People are just generally pissed off at how things are going in this country. If people who are losing everything can't keep their cool and just snap...it really bothers me how ugly this could get. That means cops are going to be a hell of a lot busier with violent encounters. And obviously none of us like that idea.

Well...you have fun with your "Fun Guns" and shoot a few rounds for me. I'm trying to clean up a rifle I've got and get it in excellent condition before firing it. It's an antique so, it needs a little TLC before I go to the range.

See ya all later

"Is your number still 911?" - Ofc. Rachel T.

5/19/2009 10:10 PM #10
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 213

RE: April 2009: Falls Church, Virginia


It's not just bad cops or soldiers these days. Nowadays some gangs are training to military standards, even using various military booklets for 'basic training'. There has been ample evidence that gangs have even sent gang members into the military and Police academies to accrue training. Then you have gangs like the Zetias...Mexican special forces created to fight drug dealers who were bought by said dealers and now work as enforcers along the border. They've been crossing the border to conduct kidnappings and such, kidnapping one person even as far as Flagstaff, Az.

« Previous12Next »
Police Magazine