FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Columns : Editorial

Bookmark and Share
SHARING TOOLS   | Email Print RSS

September 17, 2009

The Fallacy of the Nonviolent Offender

Just because some convict is classified "nonviolent" that doesn't mean he is.

by David Griffith - Also by this author


If you listen to prison reform advocates in this country, you'll hear that our state pens are full of nonviolent drug users who got smacked down by "The Man" because they were huffing up some stems and seeds in a bong.

That's the argument that a number of newspapers and political figures are using to advance the idea that we should release some prisoners early to reduce prison overcrowding and save money.

That argument is dangerous to you and the people you serve.

First, in most states, Joe the Stoner does not go to the pen; he goes to drug rehab or diversion (or he goes home because hardly anybody prosecutes stoners anymore). And everyone advancing this argument should know that to be the case: After all, they are the ones who established alternative drug sentencing in the first place.

The "nonviolent" offenders populating our prisons are not college students caught with dime bags. They are dangerous people who fall into two classes: those who actually committed nonviolent offenses and were convicted of those offenses or those who plea-bargained down from other offenses-likely violent offenses-and were convicted of a nonviolent offense.

"Nonviolent" offenders sent to penitentiaries are not nice people. They could have committed any of the following crimes and still be classified "nonviolent": burglary, breaking and entering, grand theft auto, identity theft, drug trafficking, and the list goes on and on.

And remember, these are just the crimes that got them convicted. It's not hard to imagine that the guy busted for drug trafficking was maybe carrying an illegal concealed weapon at the same time he was collared for slinging rock cocaine and maybe there's strong evidence that he used that gun to throw a few rounds at a rival. Facing an assault with a deadly weapon charge, our drug trafficker is advised by his public defender to cop a plea to selling rock cocaine. Presto! He is now a nonviolent offender.

Here's all you really need to know about so-called nonviolent offenders. In 2004 the Bureau of Justice Statistics studied nonviolent offenders exiting state prisons. Here's the highlights of that study:

  • Some 95 percent of these inmates had been arrested prior to the arrest that sent them to prison
  • About 33 percent of "nonviolent" offenders had a history of arrests for violent crimes
  • Eight percent of nonviolent offenders used a weapon during their "nonviolent" offense
  • Approximately 70 percent of nonviolent offenders are rearrested within three years

These are the people that prison reformers and bean counters want to put back on the street. You will have to clean up the mess. And it will get very messy.

Consider these two guys who were classified as "nonviolent" offenders by the legal system.

Patrick Tracy Burris-This lovely dude recently killed five people in a serial shooting spree in Gaffney, S.C. He was shot and killed by Gastonia, N.C., officers who tried to arrest him for an unrelated offense. One of those officers was shot in the leg.

Burris had a rap sheet reportedly 25 pages long, but no convictions for "violent" offenses.

Charles Samuel-Although he should have been imprisoned for life under California's three strikes law, Samuel was free on the streets of Los Angeles on July 26 when 17-year-old Lily Burk was carjacked, kidnapped, and murdered. Samuel has been charged with the crime.

Samuel's first two strikes were residential robbery and burglary. So he had two serious felonies on his record, one violent. In 2006, Samuel was charged with petty theft in Los Angeles. Even though his third strike was a minor nonviolent offense, L.A. County prosecutors could have sent Samuel away for life. But district attorney Steve Cooley has an unofficial policy of not pursuing a third strike for a minor offense because he doesn't want to be in the paper defending the prosecution of some homeless convict for stealing a slice of pizza. So as far as L.A. County was concerned, Samuel was a "nonviolent" offender, even though he had previously committed violent felonies.

The next time somebody tells you that it's a great idea to let "nonviolent" offenders out of prison, tell them about Lily Burk and the five people murdered in Gaffney. Then tell them to shut up.

View/Write Comments


Other Recent Stories

Curbside Justice
Encompassing everything from red curbs to alleyways, from metered parking spots to...
Crime Scene Photos: Show Some Common Decency
Just like every woman on every porn site is somebody's daughter, every bloody corpse on...
Cognitive Dissonance
I focused on several likely hiding places: a container of Comet cleanser, filled with just...
Justifying Temporary Detentions
When a marked police car pulls into a high-crime area and people start running away for no...
Shots Fired: Reno, Nevada 02•23•1984
Hastings walked to the Fireside Lounge on the corner of Fourth and Lake Streets, dialed up...

Comments (2)

SIGN IN TO LEAVE A COMMENT

NOT A MEMBER YET?

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
     

euroautolover @ 9/28/2009 3:00 PM

Working in a halfway house and as an escort for a SVP, I know and understand the differences and similarities between violent and "non-violent" offenders. As you state in the beginning of your article, offenders sent to the pen are not "college students with dime bags." Reformers need to understand that with a drug infested lifestyle, especially on the selling/manufacturing end, violence is inevitable.<br /><br />The mention of Lily Burk was especially saddening and an eye opener. Thank you for the mention.<br /><br />Latif Tanner

     

Topgun1 @ 11/16/2009 11:00 AM

Well said. The shame is the fact that most of the media prefers to sell the poor old picked on by the police "non-violent" offender story in spite of any facts to the contrary.<br /><br />Be safe.

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of over 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Enewsletter Subscription:
Police Magazine